RESOLVED FIXED 38867
[Qt] Unskip fast/loader/main-document-url-for-non-http-loads.htm
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38867
Summary [Qt] Unskip fast/loader/main-document-url-for-non-http-loads.htm
Robert Hogan
Reported 2010-05-10 14:29:43 PDT
Fix FrameLoadeClientQt.cpp to print relative filename paths correctly.
Attachments
Patch (6.23 KB, patch)
2010-05-10 14:43 PDT, Robert Hogan
no flags
Patch (21.68 KB, patch)
2010-05-16 11:30 PDT, Robert Hogan
kenneth: review+
remove some unused symbols (1.90 KB, patch)
2010-05-18 16:09 PDT, Laszlo Gombos
no flags
Robert Hogan
Comment 1 2010-05-10 14:43:55 PDT
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 2 2010-05-13 11:20:39 PDT
Comment on attachment 55606 [details] Patch WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:100 + void QWEBKIT_EXPORT qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks_path(const QString& path) That is not how we name private methods, plus shouldn't this be in the DRTSupport class you created? WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:102 + dumpResourceLoadCallbacksPath = path + "/"; Is this right on all platforms? Maybe add a comment
Robert Hogan
Comment 3 2010-05-13 13:21:27 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 55606 [details]) > WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:100 > + void QWEBKIT_EXPORT qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks_path(const QString& path) > That is not how we name private methods, plus shouldn't this be in the DRTSupport class you created? It's in the style of qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks() so let me know what it should be and I'll rename all of them as appropriate. FrameLoaderClientQt doesn't use the DRTSupport class at all, maybe it should. I'll look into it. > > WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:102 > + dumpResourceLoadCallbacksPath = path + "/"; > Is this right on all platforms? Maybe add a comment Good point, will fix/comment.
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 4 2010-05-13 13:52:11 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (From update of attachment 55606 [details] [details]) > > WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:100 > > + void QWEBKIT_EXPORT qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks_path(const QString& path) > > That is not how we name private methods, plus shouldn't this be in the DRTSupport class you created? > > It's in the style of qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks() so let me know what it should be and I'll rename all of them as appropriate. > > FrameLoaderClientQt doesn't use the DRTSupport class at all, maybe it should. I'll look into it. qt_dumpResourceLoadCallbacksPath(...) But isn't this for DRT usage only?
Robert Hogan
Comment 5 2010-05-13 14:56:12 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > (From update of attachment 55606 [details] [details] [details]) > > > WebKit/qt/WebCoreSupport/FrameLoaderClientQt.cpp:100 > > > + void QWEBKIT_EXPORT qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks_path(const QString& path) > > > That is not how we name private methods, plus shouldn't this be in the DRTSupport class you created? > > > > It's in the style of qt_dump_resource_load_callbacks() so let me know what it should be and I'll rename all of them as appropriate. > > > > FrameLoaderClientQt doesn't use the DRTSupport class at all, maybe it should. I'll look into it. > > qt_dumpResourceLoadCallbacksPath(...) > > But isn't this for DRT usage only? Yes it is. All the resource callbacks in frameloaderclientqt sit in the DRT on other ports. I didn't move them into DRTSupport because I encountered a hitch I didn't know how to get around and can't remember what it was now. I'll try it again and if it's possible move them all over with this patch.
Robert Hogan
Comment 6 2010-05-16 11:30:02 PDT
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 7 2010-05-16 12:21:08 PDT
Comment on attachment 56190 [details] Patch I would probably have suggested you to do this as two separate patches, but just remember that next time. Great change though :-) Thanks for doing this! Before you commit, please talk to Laszlo to see if someone depends on these functions that you removed, though I guess not.
Robert Hogan
Comment 8 2010-05-16 12:41:38 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 56190 [details]) > I would probably have suggested you to do this as two separate patches, but just remember that next time. > > Great change though :-) Thanks for doing this! > > Before you commit, please talk to Laszlo to see if someone depends on these functions that you removed, though I guess not. I've retained the old style calls at the end of DumpRenderTreeSupportQt so it shouldn't discombobulate(!) anyone using the 'private' API in their clients.
Laszlo Gombos
Comment 9 2010-05-18 16:09:16 PDT
Created attachment 56419 [details] remove some unused symbols There was no QtWebKit release made with these symbols, it should be safe to remove them.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 10 2010-05-20 08:01:10 PDT
Comment on attachment 56419 [details] remove some unused symbols Clearing flags on attachment: 56419 Committed r59836: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/59836>
Shinichiro Hamaji
Comment 11 2010-06-17 01:27:46 PDT
I think this issue was fixed by http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/59580 Closing...
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.