RESOLVED FIXED Bug 37578
[Chromium] Consider implementing addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry method
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37578
Summary [Chromium] Consider implementing addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry method
anton muhin
Reported 2010-04-14 09:03:01 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/57535/ brought this into Safari. For now those layout tests: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-all.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-exact-match.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-https.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-ip-addresses-with- subdomains.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-ip-addresses.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-subdomains.html http/tests/security/local-image-from-remote-whitelisted.html http/tests/xmlhttprequest/origin-whitelisting-removal.html are skipped for Chromium.
Attachments
Patch (2.73 KB, patch)
2010-04-28 08:15 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Patch (4.25 KB, patch)
2010-04-29 07:49 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Adding DEPRECATED tags (4.46 KB, patch)
2010-04-29 08:51 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Same as previous, to bypass r+ (4.46 KB, patch)
2010-04-29 09:25 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Now with correct Reviewed by (4.46 KB, patch)
2010-04-29 09:29 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Remove deprecated methods (2.75 KB, patch)
2010-05-06 08:57 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Adding DRT files (7.27 KB, patch)
2010-05-06 09:20 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Resolve a conflict (4.57 KB, patch)
2010-05-14 04:28 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
Patch (1.94 KB, patch)
2010-05-21 05:17 PDT, anton muhin
no flags
anton muhin
Comment 1 2010-04-14 09:11:07 PDT
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37577 modified Chromium's test_expectations to skip the tests.
David Levin
Comment 2 2010-04-15 10:32:42 PDT
This simply looks like a work item for Chromium's DRT/test_shell. The work involved would be to expose this through the Chromium WebKit API and then use it in test_shell. Similar to what was done for Windows and OSX in https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=53259&action=prettypatch Anton, perhaps you could tackle this as a clean up task?
anton muhin
Comment 3 2010-04-16 11:39:17 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > This simply looks like a work item for Chromium's DRT/test_shell. > > The work involved would be to expose this through the Chromium WebKit API and > then use it in test_shell. Similar to what was done for Windows and OSX in > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=53259&action=prettypatch > > Anton, perhaps you could tackle this as a clean up task? David, I'll try to implement it, but probably somewhat later. Or you think this is urgent?
David Levin
Comment 4 2010-04-16 11:43:18 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > David, I'll try to implement it, but probably somewhat later. Or you think > this is urgent? Not urgent.
anton muhin
Comment 5 2010-04-28 08:07:55 PDT
Some more updates. There were two relevant changes: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/57535 renamed two methods and http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/57537 which added another one. My current plan would be to add new method into WebKit/WebKit/chromium and then submit a change to Chromium's test_shell which would both add new method and rename two renamed ones. After that we probably need two-sided patch to rename methods in Chromium's bridge API. Does it sound sane?
anton muhin
Comment 6 2010-04-28 08:15:14 PDT
anton muhin
Comment 7 2010-04-28 08:16:17 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=54566) [details] > Patch Name---unwhitelist....---is rather poor, but ideally we should move to add/remove as in SecurityPolicy.
David Levin
Comment 8 2010-04-28 12:49:47 PDT
Adding Darin since this is a public api change.
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 9 2010-04-28 13:31:11 PDT
Comment on attachment 54566 [details] Patch WebKit/chromium/src/WebSecurityPolicy.cpp:69 + void WebSecurityPolicy::unwhiteListAccessFromOrigin(const WebURL& sourceOrigin, Why not use the same name as the method on SecurityOrigin? I have the same question about whiteListAccessFromOrigin. Oh, I see... in r57535, SecurityOrigin::whiteListAccessFromOrigin was renamed addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry :-( How about writing a patch that switches us over to the same method names as SecurityOrigin so that we can avoid the awkward sounding "unwhiteListFoo" method name?
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 10 2010-04-28 13:33:06 PDT
I recommend doing two WebKit patches here: first patch adds the new method names, and the second patch removes the old method name. The chromium patch that you need to do to call the newly added "remove" function can also include a change to call the new form of the "add" function. Do that step before you submit the second WebKit patch.
anton muhin
Comment 11 2010-04-29 07:49:54 PDT
anton muhin
Comment 12 2010-04-29 07:52:10 PDT
(In reply to comment #10) > I recommend doing two WebKit patches here: first patch adds the new method > names, and the second patch removes the old method name. The chromium patch > that you need to do to call the newly added "remove" function can also include > a change to call the new form of the "add" function. Do that step before you > submit the second WebKit patch. Sure, Darin, and thanks a lot for comments. Please notice that there is almost invisible change in resetOriginAccessWhiteLists name: White<L>ists -> White<l>ists. May you have another look?
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 13 2010-04-29 08:16:57 PDT
Comment on attachment 54707 [details] Patch > +// To be removed when Chromium's test_shell has proper references. > +void WebSecurityPolicy::whiteListAccessFromOrigin( Please add DEPRECATED to comments like the above, so that it is easier to grep for these dead bits. Otherwise R=me
anton muhin
Comment 14 2010-04-29 08:51:43 PDT
Created attachment 54712 [details] Adding DEPRECATED tags
anton muhin
Comment 15 2010-04-29 08:52:52 PDT
(In reply to comment #13) > (From update of attachment 54707 [details]) > > +// To be removed when Chromium's test_shell has proper references. > > +void WebSecurityPolicy::whiteListAccessFromOrigin( > > Please add DEPRECATED to comments like the above, so that > it is easier to grep for these dead bits. > > Otherwise R=me Thanks, Darin. Could you r+ new patch if it's fine---I'd rather to use commit-queue as this patch is not urgent.
David Levin
Comment 16 2010-04-29 09:14:22 PDT
Rather than make Darin re-review it if this is something you would submit given Darin's r+, then you should upload the patch with the reviewed lines fixed as if you were about to check it in and then just mark the patch as cq+ (and no r? or r+, etc. -- just leave that blank). The commit queue should handle that then.
David Levin
Comment 17 2010-04-29 09:14:46 PDT
Comment on attachment 54712 [details] Adding DEPRECATED tags See comment above.
anton muhin
Comment 18 2010-04-29 09:25:17 PDT
Created attachment 54714 [details] Same as previous, to bypass r+
anton muhin
Comment 19 2010-04-29 09:26:12 PDT
(In reply to comment #17) > (From update of attachment 54712 [details]) > See comment above. Thanks a lot, David. Trying this approach. Sorry for noise.
anton muhin
Comment 20 2010-04-29 09:29:12 PDT
Created attachment 54715 [details] Now with correct Reviewed by
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 21 2010-04-29 12:15:03 PDT
Comment on attachment 54715 [details] Now with correct Reviewed by Clearing flags on attachment: 54715 Committed r58530: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/58530>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 22 2010-04-29 12:15:11 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
anton muhin
Comment 23 2010-05-06 08:57:39 PDT
Created attachment 55247 [details] Remove deprecated methods
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 24 2010-05-06 09:12:14 PDT
anton muhin
Comment 25 2010-05-06 09:20:13 PDT
Created attachment 55248 [details] Adding DRT files
anton muhin
Comment 26 2010-05-06 10:20:10 PDT
Thanks a lot, Darin.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 27 2010-05-12 11:28:36 PDT
I think this patch i supposed to be landed. So reopening the bug so the commit-queue will see it.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 28 2010-05-14 04:07:44 PDT
Comment on attachment 55248 [details] Adding DRT files Rejecting patch 55248 from commit-queue. Failed to run "[u'/Users/eseidel/Projects/CommitQueue/WebKitTools/Scripts/svn-apply', u'--reviewer', u'Darin Fisher', u'--force']" exit_code: 1 Last 500 characters of output: atching file WebKitTools/DumpRenderTree/chromium/LayoutTestController.cpp Hunk #1 FAILED at 113. Hunk #2 FAILED at 469. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1109 with fuzz 1 (offset 56 lines). 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file WebKitTools/DumpRenderTree/chromium/LayoutTestController.cpp.rej patching file WebKitTools/DumpRenderTree/chromium/LayoutTestController.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 230. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file WebKitTools/DumpRenderTree/chromium/LayoutTestController.h.rej Full output: http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/results/2281052
anton muhin
Comment 29 2010-05-14 04:28:37 PDT
Created attachment 56063 [details] Resolve a conflict
anton muhin
Comment 30 2010-05-14 04:29:47 PDT
Comment on attachment 56063 [details] Resolve a conflict as cq got stuck, someone else partially fixed the issue this patch was supposed to fix. Merge was needed. cq+ it again.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 31 2010-05-14 19:54:38 PDT
Comment on attachment 56063 [details] Resolve a conflict Clearing flags on attachment: 56063 Committed r59512: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/59512>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 32 2010-05-14 19:54:46 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
anton muhin
Comment 33 2010-05-21 05:17:42 PDT
anton muhin
Comment 34 2010-05-21 05:19:14 PDT
And the last patch, hopefully. Try bot results: http://codereview.chromium.org/2104016
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 35 2010-05-23 02:19:06 PDT
Comment on attachment 56698 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 56698 Committed r60033: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/60033>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 36 2010-05-23 02:19:14 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
anton muhin
Comment 37 2010-05-24 07:54:48 PDT
Thanks a lot, Darin. Now that should be closed for the last time.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.