WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
36638
Commit bot tried to land r? cq+ patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36638
Summary
Commit bot tried to land r? cq+ patch
Julien Chaffraix
Reported
2010-03-25 19:09:43 PDT
Found in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36531
After having attached a patch for review and set the cq to +, the bot tried to land the patch directly and failed due to not finding any reviewer. When posting the second patch, the first patch was still r? but I obsoleted it. The new patch original flags were r? and cq+.
Attachments
should work, needs testing
(1.79 KB, patch)
2011-01-09 15:23 PST
,
Eric Seidel (no email)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(6.01 KB, patch)
2011-01-10 01:56 PST
,
Eric Seidel (no email)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Adam Barth
Comment 1
2010-03-26 16:46:34 PDT
If you mark a patch commit-queue+, the bot will try to land it. If it wasn't reviewed, it doesn't sound like it's ready for commit. Why did you mark it commit-queue+?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2
2010-03-26 16:48:04 PDT
Oh posh. I think we should handle this case. We should not try to land patches which still have r? or which are marked r-. Only empty review or r+.
Julien Chaffraix
Comment 3
2010-03-26 16:55:49 PDT
(In reply to
comment #1
)
> If you mark a patch commit-queue+, the bot will try to land it. If it wasn't > reviewed, it doesn't sound like it's ready for commit. Why did you mark it > commit-queue+?
Simple, because I wanted the bot to land it for me (I usually land my patches manually to deal with the fallout). This one was special: it was a test fix so it was better to get it landed ASAP. I have barely used the commit bot so my naive thought was that the bot would just wait until was reviewed to land it.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 4
2011-01-09 15:23:41 PST
Created
attachment 78357
[details]
should work, needs testing
Adam Barth
Comment 5
2011-01-09 15:53:31 PST
Comment on
attachment 78357
[details]
should work, needs testing Looks right.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 6
2011-01-10 01:56:38 PST
Created
attachment 78381
[details]
Patch
Adam Barth
Comment 7
2011-01-10 02:09:30 PST
Comment on
attachment 78381
[details]
Patch Now, this patch, on the other hand, is very nice.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 8
2011-01-10 03:21:55 PST
Comment on
attachment 78381
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 78381 Committed
r75366
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/75366
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 9
2011-01-10 03:22:00 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug