WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
35222
REGRESSION (
r55039
): Animation starts from near end when loaded over slow network
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35222
Summary
REGRESSION (r55039): Animation starts from near end when loaded over slow net...
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Reported
2010-02-21 16:41:28 PST
The change in <
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/changeset/55039
> for
bug 35115
has caused animations to attempt to "catch up" if there is insufficient data to play through when they first attempt to animate. When loading a large animated GIF over a slow connection this often leads to the animation skipping to near the end before starting to play.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 1
2010-02-21 16:46:29 PST
Bug 35115
doesn’t provide any information about what problem it is trying to fix. The ChangeLog from the commit is similarly lacking in information. Given the lack of details and the significant nature of the regression I’d like to roll out that change and have it be addressed in some other manner.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 2
2010-02-21 16:50:13 PST
<
rdar://problem/7673523
>
Sam Weinig
Comment 3
2010-02-21 18:50:44 PST
(In reply to
comment #1
)
>
Bug 35115
doesn’t provide any information about what problem it is trying to > fix. The ChangeLog from the commit is similarly lacking in information. Given > the lack of details and the significant nature of the regression I’d like to > roll out that change and have it be addressed in some other manner.
Seems like a good idea. Do we have a way to test these things yet?
Maciej Stachowiak
Comment 4
2010-02-21 20:08:05 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #1
) > >
Bug 35115
doesn’t provide any information about what problem it is trying to > > fix. The ChangeLog from the commit is similarly lacking in information. Given > > the lack of details and the significant nature of the regression I’d like to > > roll out that change and have it be addressed in some other manner.
Sounds reasonable to me.
> Seems like a good idea. Do we have a way to test these things yet?
We clearly need to invent some sort of test mechanism since this code keeps getting broken.
Adam Barth
Comment 5
2010-02-21 22:10:38 PST
I'd be inclined to rollout first and ask questions later. May we can use canvas to test this stuff?
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 6
2010-02-22 03:18:49 PST
Rolled out in
r55076
. I’ll reopen
bug 35115
.
Peter Kasting
Comment 7
2010-02-22 11:35:54 PST
I am confused. The behavior you describe was the precise behavior the patch was designed to achieve. This isn't a bug. This behavior is necessary for sites such as YTMND which time animated GIFs to other elements such as audio.
Peter Kasting
Comment 8
2010-02-22 11:39:57 PST
Furthermore, you'll see the individual frames as soon as they come in during load. And this has been the behavior of animations ever since the original set of timing patches a couple of years ago, except for the problem fixed in
bug 35065
which could erroneously cause the animation to hang for a long time at the beginning.
Peter Kasting
Comment 9
2010-02-22 11:49:42 PST
I'm also frustrated at
comment 1
, because I gave details on the fix
bug 35115
makes on the original
bug 35065
(in
comment 4
) that caused this regression, where I wanted to patch it, and you asked that I open a different bug instead, which I did, referring back to the original issue! So this isn't context free. And finally, even if the behavior here was truly a bug, the patch on
bug 35115
only causes the timer to start before advancing from frame 1 to frame 2 -- rolling that out starts the timer before advancing frame 2 to frame 3, so you'll still see skipping in the same condition (namely, if multiple frames worth of data come in at once). Sadly none of you seem to be on IRC right now. Please ping me when you show up so we can discuss.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug