WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED INVALID
35133
check-webkit-style should check for // namespace WebCore at end of namespace blocks
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35133
Summary
check-webkit-style should check for // namespace WebCore at end of namespace ...
Eric Seidel (no email)
Reported
2010-02-18 15:25:53 PST
check-webkit-style should check for // namespace WebCore at end of namespace blocks As well as // #define FOO at end of #if FOO blocks. Per numerous examples in the guidelines:
https://webkit.org/coding/coding-style.html
As well as discussion here:
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2009-September/009807.html
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Nikolas Zimmermann
Comment 1
2010-02-18 15:28:08 PST
I think the rule needs to be removed. check-webkit-style should check that this is not present. Please see the webkit-dev archive:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.opendarwin.webkit.devel/10563/match=visual+noise
Has there been any outcome? CC'ing the people from the old discussion
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2
2010-02-18 15:31:04 PST
Either way, we need to make our guidelines and our tools agree. Right now there is only confusion.
Nikolas Zimmermann
Comment 3
2010-02-18 15:35:16 PST
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> Either way, we need to make our guidelines and our tools agree. Right now > there is only confusion.
Agreed. Consistency is all.
David Levin
Comment 4
2010-02-18 17:27:48 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > Either way, we need to make our guidelines and our tools agree. Right now > > there is only confusion. > > Agreed. Consistency is all.
Actually, the check for the comment at the end of ifdef blocks was added and then removed per discussion:
http://old.nabble.com/-endif----Foo_h-td27021241.html
(I really need to get to updating the style guide as a result of my email but this part of it, regarding ifdef comments, will not go in per the emails above.)
David Levin
Comment 5
2010-11-02 13:36:35 PDT
This is not a suggested style but some may find it helpful in some circumstances.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 6
2010-11-02 14:43:26 PDT
Sigh. I'm sad that this is left ambiguous.
David Levin
Comment 7
2010-11-02 14:47:33 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Sigh. I'm sad that this is left ambiguous.
fwiw, it sounds like in general it is recommended not to put it in and that seems to be the general consensus. (I'm not sure that the consensus was strong enough to put into a check-webkit-style rule.)
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug