RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED 34708
The number displays incorrectly if counter-increment is with an identifier and a number equivalent to the maximum value 2147483647 and grouped thirty-two times.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34708
Summary The number displays incorrectly if counter-increment is with an identifier an...
sangeetha.sugavanam
Reported 2010-02-08 09:12:04 PST
Use Case: Counter-increment with an identifier and a number equivalent to the maximum value, ident 2147483647, grouped thirty-two times. Counter-increment with an identifier and a number equivalent to the maximum value with a plus sign, ident +2147483647, grouped thirty-two times. Counter-increment with an identifier and a number equivalent to the maximum minus one value, ident 2147483646, grouped thirty-two times. Counter-increment with an identifier and a number equivalent to the maximum plus one value, ident 2147483648, grouped thirty-two times. 1. Launch QtLauncher. 2. Unzip the contents of the zip file. 3. Load the html page from the extracted zip file. 4. Click on the first link on the page. Actual outcome: The number is -32. Expected outcome: The number should be 2147483647.
Attachments
test case (15.14 KB, application/x-zip-compressed)
2010-02-08 09:13 PST, sangeetha.sugavanam
no flags
sangeetha.sugavanam
Comment 1 2010-02-08 09:13:39 PST
Created attachment 48337 [details] test case
Tor Arne Vestbø
Comment 2 2010-03-10 06:31:00 PST
Please follow the QtWebKit bug reporting guidelines when reporting bugs. See http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs Specifically: - The 'QtWebKit' component should only be used for bugs/features in the public QtWebKit API layer, not to signify that the bug is specific to the Qt port of WebKit http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs#Component - Add the keyword 'Qt' to signal that it's a Qt-related bug http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs#Keywords
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 5 2022-08-20 12:57:33 PDT
I am unable to reproduce this bug using the test cases from CSS2.1 test suite listed in Comment 03, Safari 15.6.1 passes all of them and show expected result similar to all other browsers (Chrome Canary 106 and Firefox Nightly 105). I am going to mark this as "RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED", please reopen if you think it is incorrect testing or this is not resolved. Thanks!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.