From https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33469: > 1. I don't think "InjectedScript", which is a fairly general phrase, is a good > name to give to this technology. I'd prefer a name that conveyed the fact that > this technology is only safe to use in limited circumstances. How about > "InspectorHost" (inside the inspected page) and "InspectorClient" (the Web > Inspector UI). > I agree with you that the naming is not the best. Currently the inspector front-end delegate is called InjectedScriptHost. We should come up with something more specific.
If this wasn't renamed yet, let's rename InjectedScript to InspectorScript, it is only in use in the inspector parts.
I am seeing that there is "injectedScript" in InspectorFrontEndAPI.js.
Pull request: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/20075