RESOLVED FIXED 33492
[Chromium] Move getSessionStorageNamespace from WebKitClient to WebViewClient
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33492
Summary [Chromium] Move getSessionStorageNamespace from WebKitClient to WebViewClient
Jeremy Orlow
Reported 2010-01-11 14:13:35 PST
[Chromium] Move getSessionStorageNamespace from WebKitClient to WebViewClient
Attachments
Patch (7.24 KB, patch)
2010-01-11 14:14 PST, Jeremy Orlow
no flags
Patch (7.21 KB, patch)
2010-01-11 15:58 PST, Jeremy Orlow
fishd: review+
fishd: commit-queue-
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 1 2010-01-11 14:14:27 PST
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 2 2010-01-11 15:33:25 PST
Comment on attachment 46308 [details] Patch > Index: WebCore/ChangeLog ... > + No new tests. (OOPS!) ^^^ need to delete this line > Index: WebKit/chromium/public/WebKitClient.h ... > + // THIS IS DEPRICATED. WebViewClient::getSessionStorageNamespace() is the new way to access this. ^^^ deprecated > Index: WebKit/chromium/public/WebViewClient.h > + // Session Storage ------------------------------------------------------ > + > + // Get the session storage namespace associated with this WebView. > + virtual WebStorageNamespace* getSessionStorageNamespace() { return 0; } why isn't this called createSessionStorageNamespace? if the embedder owns the returned pointer, then you should just call this sessionStorageNamespace.
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 3 2010-01-11 15:58:11 PST
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 4 2010-01-11 23:47:55 PST
Comment on attachment 46315 [details] Patch > Index: WebKit/chromium/public/WebViewClient.h ... > + // Get the session storage namespace associated with this WebView. > + virtual WebStorageNamespace* createSessionStorageNamespace() { return 0; } Fix the comment to say "Create a..." Also, please move this up into the factory section of WebViewClient. R=me, but please fix these before committing.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 5 2010-01-12 04:05:30 PST
Attachment 46315 [details] was posted by a committer and has review+, assigning to Jeremy Orlow for commit.
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 6 2010-01-12 22:51:48 PST
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 7 2010-01-13 11:22:24 PST
Re-opening as my previous patch had to be reverted.
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 8 2010-01-13 14:51:24 PST
Problem fixed upstream. Will re-land the r+'ed patch.
Jeremy Orlow
Comment 9 2010-01-13 15:39:13 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.