WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
31930
We don't need 270k memory to determine the vptrs
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31930
Summary
We don't need 270k memory to determine the vptrs
Zoltan Herczeg
Reported
2009-11-27 05:42:03 PST
I think it is a typo.
Attachments
Allocation fix
(2.35 KB, patch)
2009-11-27 05:48 PST
,
Zoltan Herczeg
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch update (by Sam Weinig)
(2.56 KB, patch)
2009-11-30 01:18 PST
,
Zoltan Herczeg
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Zoltan Herczeg
Comment 1
2009-11-27 05:48:05 PST
Created
attachment 43946
[details]
Allocation fix
Gavin Barraclough
Comment 2
2009-11-27 15:26:25 PST
Comment on
attachment 43946
[details]
Allocation fix Lol, no, I don't think this should be taking 270k! Nice catch. r+ with one comment, since you're no longer calling fastMalloc could you also please delete the comment saying: // Bizarrely, calling fastMalloc here is faster than allocating space on the stack. cheers, G.
Zoltan Horvath
Comment 3
2009-11-28 02:31:40 PST
Committed
r51457
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/51457
>
Zoltan Herczeg
Comment 4
2009-11-30 01:18:33 PST
Created
attachment 44011
[details]
Patch update (by Sam Weinig) Additional changes suggested by Sam. (He probably meant COMPILE_ASSERT since STATIC_ASSERT does not exists) Should be reviewed by him.
Adam Barth
Comment 5
2009-11-30 12:50:35 PST
style-queue ran check-webkit-style on
attachment 44011
[details]
without any errors.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 6
2009-11-30 21:46:36 PST
Comment on
attachment 44011
[details]
Patch update (by Sam Weinig) The speedup is only in debug builds I'm sure.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 7
2009-11-30 21:47:41 PST
I can't tell if this bug should be closed or not. I reviewed an r? pach on it, but I'm not sure if it should have been closed in the first place.
Zoltan Herczeg
Comment 8
2009-11-30 23:30:58 PST
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> I can't tell if this bug should be closed or not. I reviewed an r? pach on it, > but I'm not sure if it should have been closed in the first place.
The first patch was the true patch. After it was landed, Sam asked me to change ASSERT-s to COMPILE_ASSERTs, and he was curious also about the gain of that patch. Thank you for reviewing, but I still feel he should review it, since he asked for these changes (unfortunately I can't specify the name of the reviewer anymore). (Hmm, if the changelog is not clear, perhaps I should make it more descriptive.)
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 9
2009-12-01 07:11:46 PST
If you want patches reviewed, you need to re-open the bug though. Re-opening the bug.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 10
2009-12-02 11:59:30 PST
Comment on
attachment 43946
[details]
Allocation fix Obsoleting this patch, it was landed as
r51457
.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 11
2009-12-09 14:46:59 PST
@Zoltan: Ping?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 12
2009-12-09 14:48:24 PST
Comment on
attachment 44011
[details]
Patch update (by Sam Weinig) Oh, never mind, This Zoltan is not the same as
zoltan@webkit.org
. queueing for auto-commit.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 13
2009-12-09 15:01:39 PST
Comment on
attachment 44011
[details]
Patch update (by Sam Weinig) Clearing flags on attachment: 44011 Committed
r51928
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/51928
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 14
2009-12-09 15:01:47 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug