Patch forthcoming.
Created attachment 42191 [details] Patch
Why is it dumb? The idea was that bugzilla-tool would increment the "v1" to "v2", "v3", etc. as additional patches were attached. This naming also assumes that the first patch isn't always accepted when reviewed and that further patches would be posted.
Comment on attachment 42191 [details] Patch It might make sense to add back the v1 part once we get the version incrementing to work. As it stands, it looks silly to have several patches uploaded to a bug all labeled "v1".
Comment on attachment 42191 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 42191 Committed r50346: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/50346>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 42191 [details]) > It might make sense to add back the v1 part once we get the version > incrementing to work. As it stands, it looks silly to have several patches > uploaded to a bug all labeled "v1". Having several patches all labeled "Patch" is equally as lame as having them all labeled "Patch v1". I would have rather seen you implement that feature rather than back out this change, but whatever.