RESOLVED FIXED 29137
[WinCE] Loss of accuracy: Using abs() instead of fabs() in addArcTo() 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29137
Summary [WinCE] Loss of accuracy: Using abs() instead of fabs() in addArcTo()
Jakob Petsovits
Reported 2009-09-10 12:00:33 PDT
PlatformPathWinCE does lots of calculations on doubles, but in one place in addArcTo() it's unintentionally using the integer abs() function instead of fabs(), thus losing accuracy, which can lead to incorrect drawing of arcs. See the patch below which fixes this.
Attachments
Use fabs() in order to fix addArcTo(). (2.00 KB, patch)
2009-09-10 12:06 PDT, Jakob Petsovits 		eric: review-
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Jakob Petsovits
Comment 1 2009-09-10 12:06:20 PDT
Created attachment 39365 [details] Use fabs() in order to fix addArcTo(). No new tests (OOPS!)... what should I do about that? Does WinCE come with pixel tests? If so, how can I generate some without running some WinCE emulator? Can we skip the tests because it's an obvious bug anyways, and I'm not hugely motivated to write some? the answer my friend, etc.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2 2009-09-15 23:12:59 PDT
Comment on attachment 39365 [details] Use fabs() in order to fix addArcTo(). Every change requires tests or explanation as to why testing is impossible/impractical. I'm not sure that wince has pixel tests, which would be an explanation as to why it's impossible.
George Staikos
Comment 3 2009-09-17 13:13:33 PDT
It has no pixel tests, therefore I think it should be r+. If no objection I will do so.
Patrick R. Gansterer
Comment 4 2010-07-31 12:46:46 PDT
I think we can close this bug now, because the same change was landed with http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63976.
Patrick R. Gansterer
Comment 5 2010-09-15 16:40:19 PDT
Landed with http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63976.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.