RESOLVED FIXED 28960
[Chromium] Need to add manifestUrl to ResourceResponse.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28960
Summary [Chromium] Need to add manifestUrl to ResourceResponse.
Michael Nordman
Reported 2009-09-03 18:28:28 PDT
We need to add a manifestUrl data member to ResourceResponse. Only needs to be populated for 'main' resource responses. This is needed for use to detect 'foreign' entries early on and to restart the navigation at that time.
Attachments
simple patch (2.73 KB, patch)
2009-09-03 18:30 PDT, Michael Nordman
fishd: review-
simple patch 2 (7.35 KB, patch)
2009-09-06 16:00 PDT, Michael Nordman
no flags
house cleaning (1.86 KB, patch)
2009-09-08 12:13 PDT, Michael Nordman
no flags
Michael Nordman
Comment 1 2009-09-03 18:30:14 PDT
Created attachment 39027 [details] simple patch Also fixes a NPE in our v8 bindings.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 2 2009-09-03 18:46:11 PDT
These seem like two unrelated changes.
Michael Nordman
Comment 3 2009-09-03 18:49:18 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > These seem like two unrelated changes. I guess the common thread is chrome/appcache.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 4 2009-09-04 00:16:49 PDT
How do other implementations solve the same "problem"?
Michael Nordman
Comment 5 2009-09-04 01:23:39 PDT
I presume your wondering about webcore's impl... see ApplicationCacheHost::selectCacheWithManifest and ApplicationCacheGroup::selectCache. These methods detect 'foreign' entries and as a side effect may restart the frame navigation.
Michael Nordman
Comment 6 2009-09-04 01:27:29 PDT
Also see WebAppplicationCacheHostImpl::selectCacheWithManifest() in chrome code. We solve the "problem" in the same way. We just get the manifestUrl the response was loaded from in a different way.
Michael Nordman
Comment 7 2009-09-04 14:52:28 PDT
fyi: here's the chrome-side of this http://codereview.chromium.org/201026/show
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 8 2009-09-04 22:08:26 PDT
Comment on attachment 39027 [details] simple patch > Index: WebCore/ChangeLog ... > +2009-08-31 Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com> > + > + Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). > + > + Chromium appcache modifications. > + > + No new tests. nit: please include a link to this bug report. > Index: WebCore/bindings/v8/custom/V8DOMApplicationCacheCustom.cpp ... > + if (EventListener* listener = appcache->getAttributeEventListener(toEventID(name))) > + return eventListenerToV8Object(listener); nit: indentation should be 4 white spaces > Index: WebCore/platform/network/chromium/ResourceResponse.h ... > + const KURL& getAppCacheManifestURL() const { return m_appCacheManifestURL; } getters should not start with "get"... just call this appCacheManifestURL.
Michael Nordman
Comment 9 2009-09-06 16:00:43 PDT
Created attachment 39127 [details] simple patch 2 (OOPS!) Also made changes the other existing getters/setters to match naming and style.
Michael Nordman
Comment 10 2009-09-06 16:04:37 PDT
The matching change in chrome has been updated as well... http://codereview.chromium.org/201026/show
Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)
Comment 11 2009-09-07 00:28:23 PDT
If I understand correctly, the DEPRECATED members exist so we can avoid a two-sided landing. Hence, I went ahead and set commit-queue+.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 12 2009-09-07 00:35:27 PDT
Comment on attachment 39127 [details] simple patch 2 Clearing flags on attachment: 39127 Committed r48109: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/48109>
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 13 2009-09-07 00:35:33 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Michael Nordman
Comment 14 2009-09-08 12:13:25 PDT
Created attachment 39202 [details] house cleaning Remove a few deprecated methods.
Michael Nordman
Comment 15 2009-09-08 12:15:54 PDT
Resetting status to UNCONFIRMED so the new house cleaning patch is seen. (Not sure if thats actually necessary or not for the patch to be picked up by std queries for things todo?)
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 16 2009-09-08 12:17:56 PDT
Bitten by bug 28230.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 17 2009-09-08 12:19:05 PDT
Comment on attachment 39202 [details] house cleaning Given no indication otherwise, I assume this patch can be landed w/o coordination with Chromium. r+/cq+
Michael Nordman
Comment 18 2009-09-08 12:20:44 PDT
(In reply to comment #17) > (From update of attachment 39202 [details]) > Given no indication otherwise, I assume this patch can be landed w/o > coordination with Chromium. r+/cq+ Yes, thank you!
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 19 2009-09-08 12:28:54 PDT
Comment on attachment 39202 [details] house cleaning Clearing flags on attachment: 39202 Committed r48175: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/48175>
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 20 2009-09-08 12:28:59 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.