RESOLVED FIXED 28959
Enable SHARED_WORKERS by default
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28959
Summary Enable SHARED_WORKERS by default
Andrew Wilson
Reported 2009-09-03 17:12:43 PDT
Now that SharedWorkers have feature parity with regular dedicated Workers (all of the APIs are implemented except for Database), it's time to turn on ENABLE_SHARED_WORKERS by default.
Attachments
proposed patch (77.22 KB, patch)
2009-09-03 17:24 PDT, Andrew Wilson
no flags
Patch without moving tests (33.29 KB, patch)
2009-09-04 10:19 PDT, Andrew Wilson
no flags
Updated patch with test fix (35.81 KB, patch)
2009-09-04 17:03 PDT, Andrew Wilson
levin: review+
levin: commit-queue-
Andrew Wilson
Comment 1 2009-09-03 17:24:57 PDT
Created attachment 39022 [details] proposed patch Renamed previously-disabled tests, cleaned up a couple of instances of bitrot (APIs that changed but weren't updated in disabled SharedWorker code, and turned on ENABLE_SHARED_WORKERS.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2 2009-09-04 00:22:38 PDT
Comment on attachment 39022 [details] proposed patch Some of your sharedWorker tests could just use "shouldThrow" instead of custom exception detection code. Likewise stuff which shouldn' thorugh could use shouldBeTrue("!!statement"); So there are no edits to these test files? We're just moving them? I'm surprised we didn't just have them in the Skipped lists. Could we turn on SharedWorkers first, in one patch and then enable the tests in a second one? I think that would be easier to read. Especially if the seocnd patch guarantees no changes to tests, just moving files.
Andrew Wilson
Comment 3 2009-09-04 10:19:20 PDT
Created attachment 39074 [details] Patch without moving tests Updated the patch per eric's suggestion - moved the test renamings to a separate patch. Thank god for git.
Andrew Wilson
Comment 4 2009-09-04 17:03:22 PDT
Created attachment 39100 [details] Updated patch with test fix When I merged with the latest tip-of-tree one more test started failing (apparently unhandled SharedWorker exceptions weren't being propagated to the console before, but they are now). This exposed a bug in one of the tests, which I fixed, and also necessitated updating the test expectations.
Andrew Wilson
Comment 5 2009-09-04 18:09:35 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 39022 [details]) > Some of your sharedWorker tests could just use "shouldThrow" instead of custom > exception detection code. Likewise stuff which shouldn' thorugh could use > shouldBeTrue("!!statement"); Agreed, btw. As I write new tests, I've been using the helper functions in ../js/resources/js-test-pre.js. I haven't bothered going back over earlier tests to convert them as it doesn't seem like there's much benefit.
David Levin
Comment 6 2009-09-06 16:13:12 PDT
Comment on attachment 39100 [details] Updated patch with test fix Marked as cq- because I think you wanted to land this yourself to handle possible build breakage.
Andrew Wilson
Comment 7 2009-09-07 12:54:15 PDT
Committed as r48131
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.