WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 282532
282533
Discrepancy in WebAssembly Memory64 Handling
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282533
Summary
Discrepancy in WebAssembly Memory64 Handling
tom.online1337
Reported
2024-11-04 03:20:36 PST
A differential bug has been identified between the Webkit and SpiderMonkey (SPM) JavaScript engines when executing a WebAssembly module. The discrepancy arises from the handling of memory initialization parameters in WebAssembly with memory64 support enabled. The sample program executes without errors in Webkit but throws a `TypeError` in SpiderMonkey. ## Environment (Linux, x64) - **WebKit Engine (Git a6d261838dcb9f9e9c7bad991bc3d880ae5358ee)**: - **Command**: ```bash ./jsc ./test.js ``` - **Output**: Executes without errors. - **SpiderMonkey Engine(Git 4f44c14a73993e4490646bde47eacbf2b9d267aa)**: - **Command**: ```bash ./js ./program.js ``` - **Output**: Throws `TypeError: bad Memory initial size`. ## Test Case The JavaScript code causing the differential behavior is as follows: ```js const v1 = {"index":"i64","initial":"1","maximum":"32"}; const v2 = new WebAssembly.Memory(v1); ``` ## Expected Behavior According to the WebAssembly memory64 proposal, the `limits` structure should support 64-bit addressing, allowing `initial` and `maximum` values to be specified as 64-bit integers. The `index` field should accept either `i32` or `i64`, indicating the address type. The relevant parts of the proposal are: ``` <PLAINTEXT> - Limits Structure: limits ::= {min u64, max u64?} - Address Type: addrtype ::= i32 | i64 - Memory Type: memtype ::= addrtype limits ``` Reference: [WebAssembly memory64 proposal](
https://github.com/WebAssembly/memory64/blob/main/proposals/memory64/Overview.md
)
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1
2024-11-11 03:21:11 PST
<
rdar://problem/139639855
>
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 2
2024-11-11 08:08:48 PST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 282532
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug