RESOLVED FIXED Bug 278230
REGRESSION(280197@main): [GTK] Crash using 2.44.3 on NVIDIA
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278230
Summary REGRESSION(280197@main): [GTK] Crash using 2.44.3 on NVIDIA
Óscar
Reported 2024-08-16 07:03:21 PDT
After an update of webkit from version 2.44.2 to 2.44.3 webkit-dependent applications (like Cinny) show a blank window. If you try to open these applications directly in epiphany (e.g. https://app.cinny.in/) it shows a sad face with an oops message.
Attachments
The content of accessing with epiphany to webkit://gpu (17.10 KB, application/json)
2024-08-17 01:49 PDT, Óscar
no flags
WebKitWebProcess coredump (19.30 MB, application/zstd)
2024-08-19 02:40 PDT, Óscar
no flags
WebKitWebProcess coredump but in txt mode (139.66 KB, text/plain)
2024-08-19 03:06 PDT, Óscar
no flags
WebKitWebProcess new coredump (153.20 KB, text/plain)
2024-08-19 06:42 PDT, Óscar
no flags
WebKitWebProcess new coredump bt full (63.43 KB, text/plain)
2024-08-19 06:51 PDT, Óscar
no flags
Adrian Perez
Comment 1 2024-08-16 07:16:04 PDT
After some back and forth testing with some help from Oscar, we have found that reverting 280197@main (bug #271477) solves the problem and makes things work again.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 2 2024-08-16 23:43:08 PDT
Could you provide the output of webkit://gpu?
Óscar
Comment 3 2024-08-17 01:48:49 PDT
Yes, of course, no problem, I attach it as `webkit_gpu.json`.
Óscar
Comment 4 2024-08-17 01:49:48 PDT
Created attachment 472197 [details] The content of accessing with epiphany to webkit://gpu
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 5 2024-08-18 22:33:14 PDT
hmm, this is weird, with gtk 4.14 it should be using be the GdkDmabufTextureBuilder API, I don't understand why building the texture a bit later makes it fail. There's an error message when gdk_dmabuf_texture_builder_build fails, do you see any message in stderr?
Óscar
Comment 6 2024-08-19 01:11:23 PDT
Nothing special, it just says: (epiphany:17467): epiphany-WARNING **: 10:08:43.779: Web process crashed And it shows the page that reads: Oops! Something went wrong while displaying this page. Please reload or visit a different page to continue. And if I press reload it says the same thing again by console: (epiphany:17467): epiphany-WARNING **: 10:09:46.496: Web process crashed
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 7 2024-08-19 02:11:11 PDT
Ah, so it's not that we don't render anything, it's that th web process is crashing? Then we need a backtrace of the web process.
Óscar
Comment 8 2024-08-19 02:40:25 PDT
Created attachment 472219 [details] WebKitWebProcess coredump
Óscar
Comment 9 2024-08-19 02:47:55 PDT
I attach the coredump to see if it is valid for you. I noticed that the ArchLinux version webkitgtk-6.0-2.44.3-3 works for me. As far as I see in that version applies this patch https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/webkitgtk-6.0/-/commit/6cfd95a18b6b809b6df709429a846ce0ee5b7b6d#6d4b9cb60e84aaccad0e74c87b9ee1973b19b434 that reverts the commit 279c9d7963182cc35cf4e0bfebe87df2d83eaef8. I comment it in case it sheds more light on the problem.
Óscar
Comment 10 2024-08-19 03:06:33 PDT
Created attachment 472220 [details] WebKitWebProcess coredump but in txt mode Output of: coredumpctl gdb PID thread apply all bt
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 11 2024-08-19 05:54:24 PDT
(In reply to Óscar from comment #9) > I attach the coredump to see if it is valid for you. Please don't. It's only useful on your computer. (In reply to Óscar from comment #10) > Created attachment 472220 [details] > WebKitWebProcess coredump but in txt mode > > Output of: > coredumpctl gdb PID > thread apply all bt This is what we need, except we need you to install debuginfo first. See these instructions: https://handbook.gnome.org/issues/stack-traces.html That said, the best we can hope for is to see frames 4 and 5: Thread 1 (Thread 0x763dc0c006c0 (LWP 34)): #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x0000763e7d2a5463 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x0000763e7d24c120 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 #3 0x0000763e7d2334c3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #4 0x0000763e7b307846 in ?? () #5 0x0000763dc0bf62f0 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) I wonder why the stack is corrupted.
Óscar
Comment 12 2024-08-19 06:42:14 PDT
Created attachment 472223 [details] WebKitWebProcess new coredump New coredump where I believe the stack is not corrupted.
Óscar
Comment 13 2024-08-19 06:51:23 PDT
Created attachment 472224 [details] WebKitWebProcess new coredump bt full Now running coredumpctl gdb PID bt full I don't know if it will be worth much, it seems to say a lot less.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 14 2024-08-19 07:05:07 PDT
Unfortunately the backtrace is useless. All I can see is something is wrong in JavaScriptCore. We might need to reassign this bug to the JSC component. Can you please check to be sure the bug is truly caused by NVIDIA graphics? That sounded plausible at first, but now that it looks like a problem in JSC rather than a graphics problem, it seems weirder.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 15 2024-08-19 07:06:39 PDT
And I can see you did install debuginfo for /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-6.0.so.1 using debuginfod (thanks) so you did everything properly. JSC is just complicated; I treat it as a magic black box that only JSC developers know how to debug....
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 16 2024-08-19 07:28:47 PDT
(In reply to Adrian Perez from comment #1) > After some back and forth testing with some help from Oscar, we have > found that reverting 280197@main (bug #271477) solves the problem > and makes things work again. Um, wait, I forgot we already tracked down the regression commit. Clearly this change has nothing to do with JavaScriptCore. I don't understand the backtrace.
miout-13
Comment 17 2024-09-05 13:18:39 PDT
Hello, the issue is still present in Fedora 40 with Gnome 46.4
Adrian Perez
Comment 18 2024-10-09 15:53:46 PDT
@Óscar, I think you have tried 2.46.x and that works now for you. Could you confirm? Thanks!
Óscar
Comment 19 2024-10-09 23:20:50 PDT
@Adrian Yes, I have not had any more problems of this kind, I think that the bug can be closed. Thank you all for your help!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.