RESOLVED FIXED Bug 27772
PopupMenuQt lacks disabled and selected support
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27772
Summary PopupMenuQt lacks disabled and selected support
Mike Fenton
Reported 2009-07-28 11:31:48 PDT
PopupMenuQt previously had a code block defined out that was meant to provide the ability to disable entries and select the current entry. This functionality should be re-instated.
Attachments
Patch that enables selected and disabled support for PopupMenuQt. (1.63 KB, patch)
2009-07-28 12:05 PDT, Mike Fenton
manyoso: review-
Patch with updated style / model check. (1.63 KB, patch)
2009-07-30 11:37 PDT, Mike Fenton
manyoso: review+
Mike Fenton
Comment 1 2009-07-28 12:05:30 PDT
Created attachment 33658 [details] Patch that enables selected and disabled support for PopupMenuQt.
Adam Treat
Comment 2 2009-07-30 09:41:06 PDT
Comment on attachment 33658 [details] Patch that enables selected and disabled support for PopupMenuQt. > diff --git a/WebCore/ChangeLog b/WebCore/ChangeLog > + QStandardItemModel *model = qobject_cast<QStandardItemModel*>(m_popup->model()); > + Q_ASSERT(model); Style decoration problem. See coding guidelines. > + if (client()->itemIsSelected(i)) > + m_popup->setCurrentIndex(i); The big fear I have is that QComboBox uses QStandardItemModel internally... if they change that to using something else we'll be asserting. How about this... Still ASSERT on the model, but further down replace with: if (model && !client()->itemIsEnabled()) That way we won't worry in release builds. Sound ok?
Mike Fenton
Comment 3 2009-07-30 11:37:53 PDT
Created attachment 33795 [details] Patch with updated style / model check. Thanks for the review. Patch is updated as suggested.
Adam Treat
Comment 4 2009-07-30 11:58:27 PDT
Comment on attachment 33795 [details] Patch with updated style / model check. > diff --git a/WebCore/ChangeLog b/WebCore/ChangeLog > + > + if (model && !client()->itemIsEnabled(i)) > + model->item(i)->setEnabled(false); > + > + if (client()->itemIsSelected(i)) > + m_popup->setCurrentIndex(i); > + } Indentation is not quite right, but I'll fix it when I land. Otherwise r=me!
Adam Treat
Comment 5 2009-07-30 12:08:14 PDT
Landed with r46593.
Simon Hausmann
Comment 6 2009-11-24 06:39:38 PST
*** Bug 23712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.