WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 265554
REGRESSION(
267629@main
): create_hash_table script runs forever on i686
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265554
Summary
REGRESSION(267629@main): create_hash_table script runs forever on i686
Michael Catanzaro
Reported
2023-11-29 16:03:25 PST
I'm investigating a regression where the create-hash-table script runs forever on i686 GNOME OS. It works fine on i686 Fedora, so something weird is going on. This is most likely caused by
267532@main
, although I still need to confirm this and figure out what exactly is going wrong.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1
2023-12-06 16:04:55 PST
<
rdar://problem/119280476
>
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 2
2023-12-07 13:07:01 PST
OK, I needed a lot of help to get a working edit/compile/test environment for this architecture, but finally some progress to report! The problem is the call to calcPerfectHashSize in generateHashTableHelper runs forever. Now to figure out why.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 3
2023-12-07 13:25:37 PST
The size just keeps increasing. Here's the toplevel loop in calcPerfectHashSize: Outer loop: perfect hash size=64 Outer loop: perfect hash size=128 Outer loop: perfect hash size=256 Outer loop: perfect hash size=512 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1024 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2048 Outer loop: perfect hash size=4096 Outer loop: perfect hash size=8192 Outer loop: perfect hash size=16384 Outer loop: perfect hash size=32768 Outer loop: perfect hash size=65536 Outer loop: perfect hash size=131072 Outer loop: perfect hash size=262144 Outer loop: perfect hash size=524288 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1048576 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2097152 Outer loop: perfect hash size=4194304 Outer loop: perfect hash size=8388608 Outer loop: perfect hash size=16777216 Outer loop: perfect hash size=33554432 Outer loop: perfect hash size=67108864 Outer loop: perfect hash size=134217728 Outer loop: perfect hash size=268435456 Outer loop: perfect hash size=536870912 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1073741824 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2147483648 Outer loop: perfect hash size=4294967296 Outer loop: perfect hash size=8589934592 Outer loop: perfect hash size=17179869184 Outer loop: perfect hash size=34359738368 Outer loop: perfect hash size=68719476736 Outer loop: perfect hash size=137438953472 Outer loop: perfect hash size=274877906944 Outer loop: perfect hash size=549755813888 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1099511627776 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2199023255552 Outer loop: perfect hash size=4398046511104 Outer loop: perfect hash size=8796093022208 Outer loop: perfect hash size=17592186044416 Outer loop: perfect hash size=35184372088832 Outer loop: perfect hash size=70368744177664 Outer loop: perfect hash size=140737488355328 Outer loop: perfect hash size=281474976710656 Outer loop: perfect hash size=562949953421312 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1.12589990684262e+15 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2.25179981368525e+15 Outer loop: perfect hash size=4.5035996273705e+15 Outer loop: perfect hash size=9.00719925474099e+15 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1.8014398509482e+16 Outer loop: perfect hash size=3.6028797018964e+16 Outer loop: perfect hash size=7.20575940379279e+16 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1.44115188075856e+17 Outer loop: perfect hash size=2.88230376151712e+17 Outer loop: perfect hash size=5.76460752303423e+17 Outer loop: perfect hash size=1.15292150460685e+18 And so on. The size just keeps getting larger. (Notably, none of this work seems to be needed, since the script knows it is not building for macOS, but it's generating the macOS-only code anyway.)
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 4
2023-12-07 13:34:09 PST
I sabotaged the hashValue function to always call superFastHash rather than the new wyhash, expecting this to fix the problem, but actually no! This didn't make any difference and the script continues to run forever; the size actually reaches infinity. This is unexpected because wyhash is the new thing, but I suppose something went wrong in the adjustments made to superFastHash.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 5
2023-12-07 14:29:43 PST
The problem is in avalancheBits. Somehow changing from % $EXP2_32 to & $mask32 there has broken things, although they *seem* like two different ways to do exactly the same thing. I don't know for sure what is wrong, but I have a guess. The original code declares: my $EXP2_32 = 4294967296; which is 2^32 + 1, one larger than the largest value that can be represented in a 32-bit integer. I think this means perl cannot represent the number as an integer and must switch to either floating point or decimal representation. I've looked over
https://perldoc.perl.org/perlnumber
but am not sure which. Anyway, although I don't fully understand what is wrong, at least now I know how to unbreak the build.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 6
2023-12-07 14:52:56 PST
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from
comment #0
)
> This is most likely caused by
267532@main
, although I still need to confirm > this and figure out what exactly is going wrong.
So Fedora and Debian both build perl using lots of custom configure flags, notably -Duse64bitint [1][2]. freedesktop-sdk (used by gnome-build-meta) has a much simpler configuration lacking this flag [3]. I don't know for sure that this is to blame, but it sure does seem extremely suspicious, so I'm going to test and find out! [1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/blob/b26fbaf78a425b0e5db3701c55e29bbc7e4b146d/f/perl.spec#_4393
[2]
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/perl/perl_5.36.0-7.debian.tar.xz
containing config.debian [3]
https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/freedesktop-sdk/-/blob/f41d6422547acca4dee3b190410162011dc640ae/elements/components/perl.bst
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 7
2023-12-07 16:10:35 PST
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from
comment #3
)
> (Notably, none of this work seems to be needed, since the script knows it is > not building for macOS, but it's generating the macOS-only code anyway.)
(Correction: the script actually does not know what OS it is building for. An Apple developer would need to modify the DerivedSources.make to pass a new arg to the script. Probably isn't worth the effort.)
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 8
2023-12-07 19:07:49 PST
Cross-reference:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/merge_requests/2537/
Mark Lam
Comment 9
2023-12-07 22:18:02 PST
Michael, on my macOS build, the highest value that `pefectHashSize` ever reaches is 2048. I suggest you compare your run on i686 GNOME OS against the run on i686 Fedora, and see where things diverge.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 10
2023-12-08 05:46:30 PST
(In reply to Mark Lam from
comment #9
)
> Michael, on my macOS build, the highest value that `pefectHashSize` ever > reaches is 2048. I suggest you compare your run on i686 GNOME OS against > the run on i686 Fedora, and see where things diverge.
Basically the mask operations in avalancheBits are not working as intended (
comment #5
). I think that's because they expect the hash to be an integer, but it's not an integer anymore. However, this script uses bigint [1] which is specifically designed to avoid this problem. I suspect I may have broken this myself in
267629@main
because the syntax I used to avoid the build failure does not match the import syntax suggested by [1]. So now I want to figure out how to revert
267629@main
without reintroducing
bug #261150
. I also want to add a guard to calcPerfectHashSize to bail out if the hash size reaches an unreasonable value. [1]
https://perldoc.perl.org/bigint
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 11
2023-12-08 06:18:57 PST
Problem is
https://perldoc.perl.org/Math::BigInt
and
https://perldoc.perl.org/bigint
are different perl modules that have confusingly-similar names.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 12
2023-12-08 08:10:05 PST
Pull request:
https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/21503
EWS
Comment 13
2023-12-08 15:53:18 PST
Committed
271765@main
(08395c362d95): <
https://commits.webkit.org/271765@main
> Reviewed commits have been landed. Closing PR #21503 and removing active labels.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug