WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
NEW
258002
"Advanced privacy protection" should not be blocked on first-party sites.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258002
Summary
"Advanced privacy protection" should not be blocked on first-party sites.
sbdok6kgic
Reported
2023-06-12 21:54:07 PDT
"Advanced Privacy Protection" also blocks communication when a request is made by first-party site. You should not be blocked if a request is made by a first-party site.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
John Wilander
Comment 1
2023-06-13 09:44:34 PDT
Hi! Could you explain what is blocked, please? Is it a subresource request? If so, does the subresource request start out as first party but CNAME-mapped to a third party? Thanks!
sbdok6kgic
Comment 2
2023-06-13 20:58:16 PDT
Hi! Thanks for your comment. Here are some examples I found. Blocked connection
https://go.adjust.com/l/597731/2018-11-20/n95w8v?theme=dark&locale=ja&Last_Thank_You_Redirect_URL=https://www.adjust.com/ja/thank-you/demo-requests/
in displaying
https://www.adjust.com/ja/request-a-demo/see-adjust/
Blocked connection
https://www.instagram.com/logging/falco
in displaying
https://www.instagram.com/
Blocked connection
https://b92.yahoo.co.jp/js/s_retargeting.js
in displaying
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/lifedrinkcompany/zaosoda-500-48.html?sc_i=shp_pc_search_itemlist_shsrg_img
Blocked connection
https://adservice.google.co.jp/adsid/google/ui
in displaying
https://www.google.co.jp/
Blocked connection
https://aax-fe.amazon.co.jp/x/px/RP_zK1e5cfJbbmIz-Xn7DDsAAAGIt-9iFAcAAAIAAQBvbm9fdHhuX2JpZDEgICBvbm9fdHhuX2ltcDEgICBLHAqZ/atf/%7B%22atf%22:false,%22ape_al%22:true%7D
in displaying
https://www.amazon.co.jp
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 3
2023-06-13 21:06:28 PDT
Thanks for the information! I think that in the case of
https://www.instagram.com/logging/falco
, we should definitely not be blocking that, since it's a proper first party — do you happen to have an example instagram page where you're seeing that? (I tried going to a couple instagram pages in private browsing in Safari 17 on Sonoma, but didn't observe that connection being blocked). With regards to the others: • go.adjust.com is a CNAME alias for pi-ue1-public-lb-f0209c6950285322.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com • b92.yahoo.co.jp is a CNAME alias for edge.g.yimg.jp (this one is perhaps a bit unfortunate since yahoo.co.jp and yimg.jp are first parties in practice, but we don't have an explicit exception for that). • adservice.google.co.jp is a CNAME alias for pagead46.l.doubleclick.net • aax-fe.amazon.co.jp is a CNAME alias for aax-fe.amazon-adsystem.com (In reply to sbdok6kgic from
comment #2
)
> Hi! Thanks for your comment. > Here are some examples I found. > > Blocked connection >
https://go.adjust.com/l/597731/2018-11-20/
> n95w8v?theme=dark&locale=ja&Last_Thank_You_Redirect_URL=
https://www.adjust
. > com/ja/thank-you/demo-requests/ > in displaying
https://www.adjust.com/ja/request-a-demo/see-adjust/
> > > Blocked connection >
https://www.instagram.com/logging/falco
> in displaying
https://www.instagram.com/
> > > Blocked connection >
https://b92.yahoo.co.jp/js/s_retargeting.js
> in displaying >
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/lifedrinkcompany/zaosoda-500-48
. > html?sc_i=shp_pc_search_itemlist_shsrg_img > > > Blocked connection >
https://adservice.google.co.jp/adsid/google/ui
> in displaying
https://www.google.co.jp/
> > > Blocked connection >
https://aax-fe.amazon.co.jp/x/px/RP_zK1e5cfJbbmIz-Xn7DDsAAAGIt
- > 9iFAcAAAIAAQBvbm9fdHhuX2JpZDEgICBvbm9fdHhuX2ltcDEgICBLHAqZ/atf/%7B%22atf%22: > false,%22ape_al%22:true%7D > in displaying
https://www.amazon.co.jp
sbdok6kgic
Comment 4
2023-06-13 21:32:53 PDT
Thank you for your investigation.
>
https://www.instagram.com/logging/falco
I can reproduce this on my device when I view the home page without logging in.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 5
2023-06-19 21:55:16 PDT
<
rdar://problem/111021509
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug