WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
255387
[IFC] InlineLevelBox::LayoutBounds is a glorified AscentAndDescent
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255387
Summary
[IFC] InlineLevelBox::LayoutBounds is a glorified AscentAndDescent
zalan
Reported
2023-04-12 21:15:45 PDT
ssia
Attachments
Patch
(38.20 KB, patch)
2023-04-12 21:20 PDT
,
zalan
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(21.09 KB, patch)
2023-04-13 09:25 PDT
,
zalan
ews-feeder
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(21.09 KB, patch)
2023-04-13 10:18 PDT
,
zalan
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(21.18 KB, patch)
2023-04-13 13:40 PDT
,
zalan
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(21.28 KB, patch)
2023-04-13 18:52 PDT
,
zalan
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(4)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
zalan
Comment 1
2023-04-12 21:20:41 PDT
Created
attachment 465880
[details]
Patch
Antti Koivisto
Comment 2
2023-04-13 06:56:09 PDT
Comment on
attachment 465880
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=465880&action=review
> Source/WebCore/layout/formattingContexts/inline/InlineLevelBox.h:76 > struct LayoutBounds { > - InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return ascent + descent; } > - bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return ascent == other.ascent && descent == other.descent; } > + LayoutBounds(AscentAndDescent); > + LayoutBounds() = default; > > - InlineLayoutUnit ascent { 0 }; > - InlineLayoutUnit descent { 0 }; > + InlineLayoutUnit ascent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.ascent; } > + InlineLayoutUnit descent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.descent; } > + > + InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.height(); } > + bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return m_ascentAndDescent == other.m_ascentAndDescent; } > + > + private: > + AscentAndDescent m_ascentAndDescent; > };
Maybe this type can be just replaced with AscentAndDescent directly? Or `using LayoutBounds = AscentAndDescent`?
zalan
Comment 3
2023-04-13 08:58:20 PDT
(In reply to Antti Koivisto from
comment #2
)
> Comment on
attachment 465880
[details]
> Patch > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=465880&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/layout/formattingContexts/inline/InlineLevelBox.h:76 > > struct LayoutBounds { > > - InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return ascent + descent; } > > - bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return ascent == other.ascent && descent == other.descent; } > > + LayoutBounds(AscentAndDescent); > > + LayoutBounds() = default; > > > > - InlineLayoutUnit ascent { 0 }; > > - InlineLayoutUnit descent { 0 }; > > + InlineLayoutUnit ascent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.ascent; } > > + InlineLayoutUnit descent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.descent; } > > + > > + InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.height(); } > > + bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return m_ascentAndDescent == other.m_ascentAndDescent; } > > + > > + private: > > + AscentAndDescent m_ascentAndDescent; > > }; > > Maybe this type can be just replaced with AscentAndDescent directly? Or > `using LayoutBounds = AscentAndDescent`?
yeah it was going to be one of the next steps, but you are right, there's no need for this intermediate step. will change.
zalan
Comment 4
2023-04-13 09:25:30 PDT
Created
attachment 465888
[details]
Patch
zalan
Comment 5
2023-04-13 10:18:53 PDT
Created
attachment 465895
[details]
Patch
zalan
Comment 6
2023-04-13 13:40:18 PDT
Created
attachment 465897
[details]
Patch
zalan
Comment 7
2023-04-13 18:52:47 PDT
Created
attachment 465906
[details]
Patch
EWS
Comment 8
2023-04-13 20:48:08 PDT
Committed
262942@main
(a055bb114d45): <
https://commits.webkit.org/262942@main
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 465906
[details]
.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 9
2023-04-13 20:49:16 PDT
<
rdar://problem/108030264
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug