Bug 251197 – resolution is an optional parameter on image-set()

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: DUPLICATE
• Component: CSS

[Karl Dubost]

Interop2023

Test is failing 

https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images/image-set/image-set-no-res-rendering-2.html?label=master&label=experimental&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2023-webcompat

#test {
  background-image: image-set(url("/images/green.png"), url("/images/green.png"));
  width: 100px;
  height: 100px;
}

is a valid syntax.

Safari accepts only 

#test {
  background-image: image-set(url("/images/green.png") 1x, url("/images/green.png") 1x);
  width: 100px;
  height: 100px;
}

The spec says: 
https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-images-4/#image-set-notation


A <resolution> (optional). This is used to help the UA decide which <image-set-option> to choose. If the image reference is for a raster image, it also specifies the image’s natural resolution, overriding any other source of data that might supply a natural resolution.

If not specified, it behaves as 1x for the purpose of selecting which <image-set-option> to use. It also defaults the image’s natural resolution to 1x, but if some other source of data supplies a natural resolution, that resolution must be honored instead.

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/104683761>

[Tim Nguyen (:ntim)]

This should be trivial to fix: https://searchfox.org/wubkat/rev/1c8b29ff201022e3a20578244e85d25d1b7706c4/Source/WebCore/css/parser/CSSPropertyParserHelpers.cpp#4432-4436

Not sure how the <= 0 case should be handled, but the !resolution case needs to fallback to 1 instead of doing an early return.

[Ryan Reno]

I'm going to dup this to https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225185 since the fix for both of these bugs is best landed together.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 225185 ***