RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 24291 24482
REGRESSION (r38635): JavaScript error using Oneida wedding registry page
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24482
Summary REGRESSION (r38635): JavaScript error using Oneida wedding registry page
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Reported 2009-03-09 21:11:23 PDT
* SUMMARY The Oneida registry page has a ship-to address form that contains JavaScript to ensure that the address lines are not more than 26 characters long. This works in Safari 3.2.x, but fails in Safari 4 Public Beta and in the latest WebKit nightly build (r41521). * STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Register for an account on <http://www.oneida.com/>. 2. On the register page, hit Cmd-Opt-C to open the Web Inspector. The following error is printed in the console: "TypeError: Result of expression 'wishListCreateFormFormObj.address1.validateLengthLT' [undefined] is not a function." 3. Fill out Ship-To address, using an address line longer than 26 characters. 4. Hit "Save" button. * RESULTS The page is submitting (instead of displaying an alert message), and an error page is printed instead. * REGRESSION This is a regression from Safari 3.2.x. * NOTES The bisect-builds script reports: Works: r38592 Fails: r38645
Attachments
Offline test case (21.25 KB, application/zip)
2009-03-09 22:40 PDT, David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
no flags
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 1 2009-03-09 21:43:18 PDT
Looks like the validateLengthLT() function is part of the qForms library: http://www.hollins.edu/qforms/docs/extension_validation.htm#validateLengthLT
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 2 2009-03-09 21:44:03 PDT
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 3 2009-03-09 21:56:10 PDT
An internal bisect reveals: Works: r38632 Fails: r38635
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 4 2009-03-09 21:58:48 PDT
Looks like more fall-out from r38635: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/38635 I will create a reduced (offline) test case.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 5 2009-03-09 22:40:48 PDT
Created attachment 28426 [details] Offline test case This is an offline test case that reproduces the issue. It could be reduced (much) further.
Cameron Zwarich (cpst)
Comment 6 2009-03-10 03:57:21 PDT
I'll take this bug.
Cameron Zwarich (cpst)
Comment 7 2009-03-10 04:09:24 PDT
As I sort of expected, this is a dupe of bug 24291 and is fixed by my patch there. I'll make some tests and put it up for review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24291 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.