NEW 242546
[ EWS macOS wk1 ] media/video-canvas-createPattern.html is a flaky failure
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242546
Summary [ EWS macOS wk1 ] media/video-canvas-createPattern.html is a flaky failure
Hercules Hjalmarsson
Reported 2022-07-08 16:50:24 PDT
media/video-canvas-createPattern.html Is a flaky text failure that has been flaky failing on macOS Release wk1. History shows that it is failing more frequently on arm64 architecture, most recently at 252245@main. HISTORY: https://results.webkit.org/?suite=layout-tests&test=media%2Fvideo-canvas-createPattern.html DIFF URL: https://build.webkit.org/results/Apple-Monterey-Release-AppleSilicon-WK1-Tests/251556@main%20(3959)/media/video-canvas-createPattern-pretty-diff.html
Attachments
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2022-07-08 16:51:29 PDT
Hercules Hjalmarsson
Comment 2 2022-07-08 16:57:49 PDT
I was able to reproduce the flaky failure ~2% out of 10k iterations on macOS ToT using a arm64 machine, with wk1 and command: run-webkit-test media/video-canvas-createPattern.html
Hercules Hjalmarsson
Comment 3 2022-07-08 17:10:43 PDT
EWS
Comment 4 2022-07-08 17:15:15 PDT
Test gardening commit 252309@main (881e36db26e6): <https://commits.webkit.org/252309@main> Reviewed commits have been landed. Closing PR #2253 and removing active labels.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 5 2022-07-09 19:10:20 PDT
It's all black: -Saw close enough to (200, 200, 0) at (40, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (200, 200, 0) at (355, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (200, 200, 0) at (40, 403) OK -Saw close enough to (200, 200, 0) at (355, 403) OK -Saw close enough to (57, 202, 203) at (56, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (57, 202, 203) at (371, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (57, 202, 203) at (56, 403) OK -Saw close enough to (57, 202, 203) at (371, 403) OK -Saw close enough to (53, 203, 9) at (73, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (53, 203, 9) at (388, 165) OK -Saw close enough to (53, 203, 9) at (73, 403) OK -Saw close enough to (53, 203, 9) at (388, 403) OK +Expected (200, 200, 0) at (40, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (200, 200, 0) at (355, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (200, 200, 0) at (40, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (200, 200, 0) at (355, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (57, 202, 203) at (56, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (57, 202, 203) at (371, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (57, 202, 203) at (56, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (57, 202, 203) at (371, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (53, 203, 9) at (73, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (53, 203, 9) at (388, 165) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (53, 203, 9) at (73, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL +Expected (53, 203, 9) at (388, 403) but saw (0, 0, 0) FAIL
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.