WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
239255
StorageMap::importItems may update currentSize wrongly in release build
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239255
Summary
StorageMap::importItems may update currentSize wrongly in release build
Sihui Liu
Reported
2022-04-12 14:53:52 PDT
...
Attachments
Patch
(2.67 KB, patch)
2022-04-12 15:21 PDT
,
Sihui Liu
ews-feeder
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(2.77 KB, patch)
2022-04-12 15:58 PDT
,
Sihui Liu
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(2.54 KB, patch)
2022-04-13 10:00 PDT
,
Sihui Liu
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(2.52 KB, patch)
2022-04-13 10:14 PDT
,
Sihui Liu
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(2.56 KB, patch)
2022-04-13 10:29 PDT
,
Sihui Liu
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(4)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sihui Liu
Comment 1
2022-04-12 15:21:35 PDT
Created
attachment 457482
[details]
Patch
Sihui Liu
Comment 2
2022-04-12 15:58:19 PDT
Created
attachment 457486
[details]
Patch
Chris Dumez
Comment 3
2022-04-12 16:01:37 PDT
Comment on
attachment 457486
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=457486&action=review
> Source/WebCore/storage/StorageMap.cpp:166 > + RELEASE_LOG_ERROR(Storage, "StorageMap::importItems failed to import because map is not empty");
Why is it OK to ignore the items in this case? If that's not supposed to happen, should we ASSERT?
Sihui Liu
Comment 4
2022-04-13 09:54:41 PDT
(In reply to Chris Dumez from
comment #3
)
> Comment on
attachment 457486
[details]
> Patch > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=457486&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/storage/StorageMap.cpp:166 > > + RELEASE_LOG_ERROR(Storage, "StorageMap::importItems failed to import because map is not empty"); > > Why is it OK to ignore the items in this case? If that's not supposed to > happen, should we ASSERT?
Yes, we can turn it into assertion
Sihui Liu
Comment 5
2022-04-13 10:00:33 PDT
Created
attachment 457539
[details]
Patch
Chris Dumez
Comment 6
2022-04-13 10:08:51 PDT
Comment on
attachment 457539
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=457539&action=review
> Source/WebCore/storage/StorageMap.cpp:166 > + CheckedUint32 newSize = m_impl->currentSize;
why `= m_impl->currentSize`? I thought the map was empty? Can we assert that m_impl->currentSize is 0 and then just use `CheckedUint32 newSize;` here?
Sihui Liu
Comment 7
2022-04-13 10:14:47 PDT
Created
attachment 457542
[details]
Patch
Chris Dumez
Comment 8
2022-04-13 10:16:32 PDT
Comment on
attachment 457542
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=457542&action=review
r=me assuming the bots are happy.
> Source/WebCore/storage/StorageMap.cpp:164 > + RELEASE_ASSERT(!m_impl->currentSize);
Why did you drop the `RELEASE_ASSERT(m_impl->map.isEmpty());` ? I feel it'd be good to check that both there is no item in the map and the size is indeed 0.
Sihui Liu
Comment 9
2022-04-13 10:27:49 PDT
Comment on
attachment 457542
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=457542&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/storage/StorageMap.cpp:164 >> + RELEASE_ASSERT(!m_impl->currentSize); > > Why did you drop the `RELEASE_ASSERT(m_impl->map.isEmpty());` ? > > I feel it'd be good to check that both there is no item in the map and the size is indeed 0.
I thought you mean replacing RELEASE_ASSERT with this... will update.
Sihui Liu
Comment 10
2022-04-13 10:29:03 PDT
Created
attachment 457543
[details]
Patch
EWS
Comment 11
2022-04-13 15:45:13 PDT
Committed
r292836
(
249609@main
): <
https://commits.webkit.org/249609@main
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 457543
[details]
.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 12
2022-04-13 15:46:16 PDT
<
rdar://problem/91719712
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug