AX: AXIsolatedObject::initializeAttributeData should compute AXAncestorFlags if they are unexpectedly uninitialized

[Tyler Wilcock]

Currently in AXIsolatedObject::initializeAttributeData we have this:

    auto ancestorFlags = object.ancestorFlags();
    // Only store the object's ancestor flags if any are set (excluding the "is initialized" flag).
    if (ancestorFlags ^ AXAncestorFlag::FlagsInitialized)
        setProperty(AXPropertyName::AncestorFlags, object.ancestorFlags());

Instead, we should do the traversal to initialize the flags rather than creating an isolated object with missing properties.

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/87556197>

[Tyler Wilcock]

Created attachment 449077 [details]
Patch

[Andres Gonzalez]

(In reply to Tyler Wilcock from comment #2)
> Created attachment 449077 [details]
> Patch

--- a/Source/WebCore/accessibility/AccessibilityObject.cpp
+++ a/Source/WebCore/accessibility/AccessibilityObject.cpp

+OptionSet<AXAncestorFlag> AccessibilityObject::computeAncestorFlagsWithTraversal() const
+{
+    OptionSet<AXAncestorFlag> computedFlags;
+    computedFlags.set(AXAncestorFlag::FlagsInitialized, true);

Shouldn't we check that it hasn't been initialized yet? At least an ASSERT to catch it on debug?

+    Accessibility::enumerateAncestors<AXCoreObject>(*this, false, [&] (const AXCoreObject& ancestor) {
+        if (is<AccessibilityObject>(ancestor))
+            computedFlags.add(downcast<AccessibilityObject>(ancestor).computeAncestorFlags());

Can't we use AccessibilityObject as template parameter? Or let the compiler infer the parameter? In either case, I don't think you would need is<> and the downcast.

[Tyler Wilcock]

Created attachment 449120 [details]
Patch

[Tyler Wilcock]

Good points. Fixed both issues with the latest patch.

[EWS]

Committed r288027 (246053@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/246053@main>

All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 449120 [details].