WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
235003
Use IsNegation bit for more efficient pseudo-class style invalidation
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235003
Summary
Use IsNegation bit for more efficient pseudo-class style invalidation
Antti Koivisto
Reported
2022-01-08 06:11:25 PST
We already use it for class invalidation.
Attachments
Patch
(25.10 KB, patch)
2022-01-08 06:19 PST
,
Antti Koivisto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(24.95 KB, patch)
2022-01-08 06:42 PST
,
Antti Koivisto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(24.95 KB, patch)
2022-01-08 06:53 PST
,
Antti Koivisto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch for landing
(27.70 KB, patch)
2022-01-09 00:30 PST
,
Antti Koivisto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Antti Koivisto
Comment 1
2022-01-08 06:19:44 PST
Created
attachment 448668
[details]
Patch
Antti Koivisto
Comment 2
2022-01-08 06:42:29 PST
Created
attachment 448669
[details]
Patch
Antti Koivisto
Comment 3
2022-01-08 06:53:32 PST
Created
attachment 448670
[details]
Patch
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 4
2022-01-08 10:17:21 PST
Comment on
attachment 448670
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448670&action=review
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > + We now know is an invaliation ruleset is for negated context. We can use this to avoid
Does not parse
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:799 > + Style::PseudoClassChangeInvalidation styleInvalidation(*this, CSSSelector::PseudoClassActive, flag, invalidationScope);
flag needs a better name
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:851 > + Style::PseudoClassChangeInvalidation focusStyleInvalidation(*this, { { CSSSelector::PseudoClassFocus, flag }, { CSSSelector::PseudoClassFocusVisible, flag } });
Ditto
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:887 > + Style::PseudoClassChangeInvalidation styleInvalidation(*this, CSSSelector::PseudoClassFocusWithin, flag);
Ditto
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:897 > + Style::PseudoClassChangeInvalidation styleInvalidation(*this, CSSSelector::PseudoClassHover, flag, invalidationScope);
Ditto
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:910 > + Style::PseudoClassChangeInvalidation styleInvalidation(*this, CSSSelector::PseudoClassDrag, flag);
Ditto
> Source/WebCore/html/HTMLInputElement.cpp:978 > -void HTMLInputElement::setChecked(bool nowChecked) > +void HTMLInputElement::setChecked(bool newChecked)
The rename doesn't really help. why not just isChecked or checked?
Antti Koivisto
Comment 5
2022-01-09 00:30:06 PST
Created
attachment 448696
[details]
Patch for landing
EWS
Comment 6
2022-01-09 01:02:54 PST
Committed
r287818
(
245870@main
): <
https://commits.webkit.org/245870@main
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 448696
[details]
.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 7
2022-01-09 01:03:18 PST
<
rdar://problem/87304694
>
Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio)
Comment 8
2022-01-09 02:45:05 PST
Comment on
attachment 448696
[details]
Patch for landing View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448696&action=review
> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:852 > + document().userActionElements().setFocused(*this, value);
Probably a bug: this is not the value that ends up getting passed to setHasFocusVisible
Antti Koivisto
Comment 9
2022-01-09 04:54:31 PST
Comment on
attachment 448696
[details]
Patch for landing View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448696&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:852 >> + document().userActionElements().setFocused(*this, value); > > Probably a bug: this is not the value that ends up getting passed to setHasFocusVisible
True though I think it just causes unnecessary invalidation in some cases (when focus changes but focus-visible stays the same).
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug