RESOLVED FIXED 23458
Reintroduce CanvasPixelArray in ImageData.idl
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23458
Summary Reintroduce CanvasPixelArray in ImageData.idl
Ivan Posva
Reported 2009-01-21 10:39:31 PST
Reintroduce CanvasPixelArray in ImageData.idl: Recent changes to the ImageData.idl broke non-JSC bindings. This change reintroduces the CanvasPixelArray and for the JSC build defines it to be equivalent to WTF::ByteArray.
Attachments
proposed patch (8.42 KB, patch)
2009-01-21 10:45 PST, Ivan Posva
oliver: review-
Return CPA to basically its old implementation, extra indirection and all (23.25 KB, patch)
2009-01-21 12:01 PST, Oliver Hunt
ap: review+
Ivan Posva
Comment 1 2009-01-21 10:45:47 PST
Created attachment 26897 [details] proposed patch Ideally I would have wanted to use "#if defined(LANGUAGE_JAVASCRIPT) && !defined(JSC_BINDING)" as you suggested to Darin, but it appears that something like JSC_BINDING does not exist in the code generator.
Oliver Hunt
Comment 2 2009-01-21 10:51:46 PST
Comment on attachment 26897 [details] proposed patch r=me
Oliver Hunt
Comment 3 2009-01-21 10:58:33 PST
Comment on attachment 26897 [details] proposed patch Actually, on second thoughts, i think a better solution would be to make CanvasPixelArray be a subclass of ByteArray for those builds that need it -- all builds should be using WTF::ByteArray to ensure consistency, and just typedef-ing the type difference away could lead to platform inconsistencies
Oliver Hunt
Comment 4 2009-01-21 11:00:57 PST
Basically, my though is that ImageData should be in terms of WTF::ByteArray, but those builds that need to declare it as type CanvasPixelArray should have there own typedef
Oliver Hunt
Comment 5 2009-01-21 11:01:41 PST
Err, need to declare in IDL -- do we support typedefs in IDL files?
Oliver Hunt
Comment 6 2009-01-21 12:01:36 PST
Created attachment 26899 [details] Return CPA to basically its old implementation, extra indirection and all This builds, just doing final layout test run atm
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 7 2009-01-21 12:12:42 PST
Comment on attachment 26899 [details] Return CPA to basically its old implementation, extra indirection and all r=me +#if !defined(LANGUAGE_JAVASCRIPT) || !defined(JSC_BINDING) ... +#if !defined(LANGUAGE_JAVASCRIPT) || defined(V8_BINDING) Is it intentional that the checks are different?
Oliver Hunt
Comment 8 2009-01-21 13:06:29 PST
Committed r40089 M WebCore/WebCore.pro M WebCore/ChangeLog M WebCore/WebCore.vcproj/WebCore.vcproj M WebCore/GNUmakefile.am M WebCore/platform/graphics/cg/ImageBufferCG.cpp M WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/ImageBufferCairo.cpp M WebCore/bindings/js/JSImageDataCustom.cpp M WebCore/html/ImageData.h A WebCore/html/CanvasPixelArray.h M WebCore/html/ImageData.idl M WebCore/html/ImageData.cpp A WebCore/html/CanvasPixelArray.idl A WebCore/html/CanvasPixelArray.cpp M WebCore/html/CanvasRenderingContext2D.cpp M WebCore/WebCore.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj M WebCore/WebCoreSources.bkl
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.