It currently reverts to the next origin.
Created attachment 446544 [details] Patch
Created attachment 446545 [details] Patch
Created attachment 446981 [details] Patch
*** Bug 233937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment on attachment 446981 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=446981&action=review > Source/WebCore/style/StyleBuilder.cpp:392 > +const PropertyCascade* Builder::ensureRollbackCascadeForRevertLayer() Mixing the terms "rollback" and "revert" make my head hurt. Can this just be "ensureRevertCascade"? And use "revert" instead of "rollback" for the rest of the patch?
> Mixing the terms "rollback" and "revert" make my head hurt. Can this just be > "ensureRevertCascade"? And use "revert" instead of "rollback" for the rest > of the patch? The spec calls the operation performed by revert keywords "rolling back" as in "If the cascaded value of a property is the revert-layer keyword, the cascaded value is rolled back to the layer below" This is trying to keep with the spec terms.
Tools/Scripts/svn-apply failed to apply attachment 446981 [details] to trunk. Please resolve the conflicts and upload a new patch.
Created attachment 447116 [details] Patch for landing
Committed r287018 (245223@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/245223@main> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 447116 [details].
<rdar://problem/86458381>