RESOLVED WONTFIX 23069
Generic section filtering with recessed buttons
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23069
Summary Generic section filtering with recessed buttons
Konstantin Käfer
Reported 2009-01-01 17:33:36 PST
Currently, there is a "Show Inherited" checkbox that allows the user to hide inherited styles. This mechanism is also useful for other things like hiding/showing DOM values etc. and should be generalized to PropertiesSection so that other parts can use it too. The filtering could be done with a recessed button to toggle filtering.
Attachments
illustrates the changes (85.77 KB, image/png)
2009-01-01 18:28 PST, Konstantin Käfer
no flags
first patch iteration. see changelog in patch for further details (37.81 KB, patch)
2009-01-01 18:31 PST, Konstantin Käfer
darin: review-
Konstantin Käfer
Comment 1 2009-01-01 18:28:17 PST
Created attachment 26356 [details] illustrates the changes
Konstantin Käfer
Comment 2 2009-01-01 18:31:50 PST
Created attachment 26357 [details] first patch iteration. see changelog in patch for further details
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 3 2009-01-01 23:05:18 PST
The appearance of the "Inherited" button now seems to be that of a scope button. Per <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/userexperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/XHIGControls/chapter_19_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30000359-SW13> this doesn't seem like an appropriate use of a scope button, especially since doesn't *behave* like a scope button. I don't understand the motivation for changing it in this fashion.
Darin Adler
Comment 4 2009-01-10 15:54:19 PST
Comment on attachment 26357 [details] first patch iteration. see changelog in patch for further details The screen shot seems to show two changes: 1) the check box is changed into a button you can depress, one that looks like a Mac OS X "scope button" 2) the layout of lines that overflow is better; the main title ends up on the top line and the subtitle ends up on second line, instead of backwards and truncating Change (2) seems like a nice improvement. Change (1) does not seem good. The check box makes more logical sense and we don't want something that looks like a "scope button" but doesn't act like one. I'd rather that the main designer of the inspector UI, Tim Hatcher, comment here, but since Mark Rowe and I are both in agreement that we don't want (1) I'm going to say review- on this patch for now.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.