WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
230287
Web Inspector: `TreeOutline` should return early when failing to find an ancestor while populating the tree
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230287
Summary
Web Inspector: `TreeOutline` should return early when failing to find an ance...
Patrick Angle
Reported
2021-09-14 18:21:47 PDT
.
Attachments
Patch v1.0
(1.79 KB, patch)
2021-09-14 18:31 PDT
,
Patrick Angle
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch v1.1
(1.79 KB, patch)
2021-09-15 14:37 PDT
,
Patrick Angle
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1
2021-09-14 18:22:02 PDT
<
rdar://problem/83125960
>
Patrick Angle
Comment 2
2021-09-14 18:31:56 PDT
Created
attachment 438201
[details]
Patch v1.0
Devin Rousso
Comment 3
2021-09-15 11:20:02 PDT
Comment on
attachment 438201
[details]
Patch v1.0 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=438201&action=review
r=me, good catch :)
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/TreeOutline.js:518 > item = this.findTreeElement(ancestors[i], isAncestor, getParent);
Aside: I wonder if maybe this should just be `this.getCachedTreeElement(ancestors[i])`, as there's really no point to walking up the `getParent` chain again since we've already done that. Tho you might need to duplicate the bit that iterates over `this.children`, but conceptually if we have an item inside `this.children` then it should already be cached.
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/TreeOutline.js:520 > + return;
this should be `return null;` to match the other `return`
Devin Rousso
Comment 4
2021-09-15 11:28:10 PDT
Comment on
attachment 438201
[details]
Patch v1.0 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=438201&action=review
>> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/TreeOutline.js:518 >> item = this.findTreeElement(ancestors[i], isAncestor, getParent); > > Aside: I wonder if maybe this should just be `this.getCachedTreeElement(ancestors[i])`, as there's really no point to walking up the `getParent` chain again since we've already done that. Tho you might need to duplicate the bit that iterates over `this.children`, but conceptually if we have an item inside `this.children` then it should already be cached.
Aside: we may also wanna add an early-return above the `while` if `getParent` is NOT provided, as right now it's kinda this silent assumption 😅
Patrick Angle
Comment 5
2021-09-15 14:37:01 PDT
Created
attachment 438291
[details]
Patch v1.1
EWS
Comment 6
2021-09-15 15:12:08 PDT
Committed
r282477
(
241725@main
): <
https://commits.webkit.org/241725@main
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 438291
[details]
.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug