RESOLVED FIXED 23023
Remove incomplete support for opportunistic apcache entries
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23023
Summary Remove incomplete support for opportunistic apcache entries
Alexey Proskuryakov
Reported 2008-12-29 04:08:47 PST
They weren't ever really supported, but no that they were removed from the spec, we can get rid of them completely.
Attachments
proposed patch (3.66 KB, patch)
2008-12-29 04:10 PST, Alexey Proskuryakov
sam: review+
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1 2008-12-29 04:10:55 PST
Created attachment 26289 [details] proposed patch
Sam Weinig
Comment 2 2008-12-29 15:53:34 PST
Comment on attachment 26289 [details] proposed patch r=me. > Index: WebCore/loader/appcache/ApplicationCacheResource.h > =================================================================== > --- WebCore/loader/appcache/ApplicationCacheResource.h (revision 39497) > +++ WebCore/loader/appcache/ApplicationCacheResource.h (working copy) > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ public: > Explicit = 1 << 2, > Foreign = 1 << 3, > Fallback = 1 << 4, > - Opportunistic = 1 << 5, > + // Bit 5 was used for opportunistic entries, which were removed from the spec. > Dynamic = 1 << 6 You should note in the changelog the reason you can't change Dynamic to use bit-5.
David Levin
Comment 3 2008-12-29 16:09:44 PST
Typo in ChangeLog: > Remove incomplete support for opportunistic apcache entries s/apcache/appcache/
Darin Adler
Comment 4 2008-12-30 10:35:34 PST
Comment on attachment 26289 [details] proposed patch > - Opportunistic = 1 << 5, > + // Bit 5 was used for opportunistic entries, which were removed from the spec. > Dynamic = 1 << 6 > }; Why keep this comment? Why not renumber Dynamic to use bit 5?
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 5 2008-12-30 10:52:44 PST
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 6 2008-12-30 10:54:20 PST
(In reply to comment #4) > Why keep this comment? Why not renumber Dynamic to use bit 5? Maybe I could do that, given that neither fallback nor dynamic entries were stored before - but I'm going to bump schema version soon, which will be a good opportunity to change this.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.