Note to self: come back later, edit the bug, update the value of N – look like you totally guessed ahead oh time how many patches this would take.
Created attachment 25761 [details] The patch
Comment on attachment 25761 [details] The patch r=me Personally, I don't think we gain anything by changing things like "mov" and "jo" in the assembler to "move" and "jover" in the macro assembler. I think "jzSub32" and "joAdd32" are probably better names than "jzeroSub32" and "joverAdd32."
Sending JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog Sending JavaScriptCore/assembler/MacroAssembler.h Sending JavaScriptCore/assembler/X86Assembler.h Sending JavaScriptCore/jit/JIT.cpp Sending JavaScriptCore/jit/JIT.h Sending JavaScriptCore/jit/JITArithmetic.cpp Sending JavaScriptCore/jit/JITInlineMethods.h Sending JavaScriptCore/jit/JITPropertyAccess.cpp Transmitting file data ........ Committed revision 39020.