RESOLVED FIXED222344
[Cocoa] Web Inspector: expose the extension host that is used to load _WKInspectorExtension tabs
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222344
Summary [Cocoa] Web Inspector: expose the extension host that is used to load _WKInsp...
Blaze Burg
Reported 2021-02-23 21:51:54 PST
.
Attachments
Patch v1.0 (6.62 KB, patch)
2021-02-23 22:02 PST, Blaze Burg
no flags
Patch v2.0 (6.24 KB, patch)
2021-02-24 16:43 PST, Blaze Burg
no flags
Patch v2.1 (6.18 KB, patch)
2021-02-24 16:57 PST, Blaze Burg
no flags
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2021-02-23 21:52:08 PST
Blaze Burg
Comment 2 2021-02-23 22:02:19 PST
Created attachment 421384 [details] Patch v1.0
Blaze Burg
Comment 3 2021-02-23 23:20:45 PST
Comment on attachment 421384 [details] Patch v1.0 Going a different route.
Blaze Burg
Comment 4 2021-02-24 16:43:18 PST
Created attachment 421482 [details] Patch v2.0
Blaze Burg
Comment 5 2021-02-24 16:57:26 PST
Created attachment 421483 [details] Patch v2.1
Devin Rousso
Comment 6 2021-02-24 17:50:19 PST
Comment on attachment 421483 [details] Patch v2.1 View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=421483&action=review r=me > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/Cocoa/_WKInspectorExtensionHost.h:66 > +@property (nonatomic, readonly) WKWebView *extensionHostWebView; NIT: It seems a bit redundant to have `extensionHost` in the name given that this protocol already has that in the name. If this is ObjC convention tho feel free to ignore :) Also, seeing as how this is the Web Inspector `WKWebView`, should we maybe just call it as such (e.g. `inspectorWebView`) rather than that being somewhat implicit or explained in the discussion?
Blaze Burg
Comment 7 2021-02-24 20:01:05 PST
(In reply to Devin Rousso from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 421483 [details] > Patch v2.1 > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=421483&action=review > > r=me > > > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/Cocoa/_WKInspectorExtensionHost.h:66 > > +@property (nonatomic, readonly) WKWebView *extensionHostWebView; > > NIT: It seems a bit redundant to have `extensionHost` in the name given that > this protocol already has that in the name. If this is ObjC convention tho > feel free to ignore :) > > Also, seeing as how this is the Web Inspector `WKWebView`, should we maybe > just call it as such (e.g. `inspectorWebView`) rather than that being > somewhat implicit or explained in the discussion? Yes, it's redundant. This is on purpose, to deter folks from doing all kinds of bad things to Inspector's WKWebView subclass because it's easier than adding proper _WKInspectorConfiguartion options or other SPI.
EWS
Comment 8 2021-02-24 22:10:44 PST
Committed r273471: <https://commits.webkit.org/r273471> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 421483 [details].
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.