WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
221681
[ Big Sur ] imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash.html is failing
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221681
Summary
[ Big Sur ] imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layo...
Robert Jenner
Reported
2021-02-10 09:33:45 PST
imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash.html Is failing in Big Sur. HISTORY URL:
https://results.webkit.org/?suite=layout-tests&test=imported%2Fw3c%2Fweb-platform-tests%2Fcss%2Fcss-flexbox%2Fcontain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash.html
DIFF URL:
https://build.webkit.org/results/Apple-BigSur-Release-WK2-Tests/r272653%20(82)/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash-pretty-diff.html
DIFF TEXT: --- /Volumes/Data/slave/bigsur-release-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash-expected.txt +++ /Volumes/Data/slave/bigsur-release-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-flexbox/contain-size-layout-abspos-flex-container-crash-actual.txt @@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ layer at (8,8) size 100x100 RenderFlexibleBox {DIV} at (0,0) size 100x100 RenderBlock (anonymous) at (0,0) size 8x100 - RenderText {#text} at (0,0) size 8x17 + RenderText {#text} at (0,0) size 8x18 text run at (0,0) width 8: "x" This started with changeset
r272644
:
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/272644/webkit
The test is failing in Big Sur for both Release and Debug, and in both Wk1 and Wk2. Is this test intended to run in Big Sur? Or is this an expected failure?
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1
2021-02-10 09:34:04 PST
<
rdar://problem/74192027
>
Ryan Haddad
Comment 2
2021-02-10 09:53:56 PST
Since this has been failing since the test was imported, we may need to add a new baseline for Big Sur.
Ryan Haddad
Comment 3
2021-02-10 20:56:25 PST
For some reason, this test had identical baselines in platform/mac-catalina and platform/mac-catalina-wk1, but nothing in platform/Mac. Perhaps the author was just adding baselines from failures seen on EWS. Fixed up the baselines by removing the Catalina specific ones and adding one for mac
r272704
.
Sergio Villar Senin
Comment 4
2021-02-11 05:39:51 PST
(In reply to Ryan Haddad from
comment #3
)
> For some reason, this test had identical baselines in platform/mac-catalina > and platform/mac-catalina-wk1, but nothing in platform/Mac. Perhaps the > author was just adding baselines from failures seen on EWS. > > Fixed up the baselines by removing the Catalina specific ones and adding one > for mac
r272704
.
Yeah I got confused by EWS, they're indeed expectations for mac. Thanks for fixing
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug