WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
221202
Webkit doesn't calculate padding-top/-bottom in % correctly when parent has padding
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221202
Summary
Webkit doesn't calculate padding-top/-bottom in % correctly when parent has p...
ik
Reported
2021-02-01 05:43:19 PST
Created
attachment 418862
[details]
Test case ** Short description: Webkit doesn't calculate height in % correctly when the parent element has padding, not even when `box-sizing: border-box;` is set. This applies to child elements with `height: 100%` and/or `padding-bottom: 100%`. ** Steps to reproduce: 1) Open the attached test-case (or
http://testcase.rejh.nl/webkit-border-box-width-height-padding/
) in Safari (Big Sur, Tech Prev 119, iOS and iPadOS 14.4) 2) Observe that none of the red boxes are the same height as their parent (yellow) [*] 3) Open the same test-case in Chrome or Firefox. 4) All red boxes are the same height as their parents [**] ** Expected result: All red boxes should be the exact same with/height as their parent [**] ** Actual result: The red boxes do not account for their parent's padding when calculating 100% height/padding-bottom. --- [*] All red boxes have a 10px top/left offset to better illustrate they are two elements. [**] I've included two boxes that use the experimental `aspect-ratio` css property as these are currently available in Tech Preview. As expected, the only browser that supports this in 'stable' releases is currently Chrome v88. However, I did expect Safari TP 119 to work correctly as its changelog states: * Added support for aspect-ratio on positioned elements (
r271061
) * Changed to take aspect-ratio into account for percentage resolution (
r271293
) It seems Webkit's implementation is not (yet) working as expected..?
Attachments
Test case
(1.10 KB, application/x-zip-compressed)
2021-02-01 05:43 PST
,
ik
no flags
Details
Result of test-case in Safari 14.0.2 on Big Sur
(133.75 KB, image/jpeg)
2021-02-01 05:46 PST
,
ik
no flags
Details
Result of test-case in Chrome 88
(71.85 KB, image/jpeg)
2021-02-01 05:46 PST
,
ik
no flags
Details
Test case v2
(1.10 KB, application/x-zip-compressed)
2021-02-01 05:55 PST
,
ik
no flags
Details
Patch
(1.48 KB, patch)
2021-05-06 09:38 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.11 KB, patch)
2021-05-06 11:42 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.11 KB, patch)
2021-05-06 12:54 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.33 KB, patch)
2021-05-06 23:20 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.54 KB, patch)
2021-05-07 00:49 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.51 KB, patch)
2021-05-28 03:39 PDT
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(6)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
ik
Comment 1
2021-02-01 05:46:12 PST
Created
attachment 418863
[details]
Result of test-case in Safari 14.0.2 on Big Sur
ik
Comment 2
2021-02-01 05:46:37 PST
Created
attachment 418864
[details]
Result of test-case in Chrome 88
ik
Comment 3
2021-02-01 05:55:12 PST
Created
attachment 418865
[details]
Test case v2 Updated test case where the first box's css was incorrect. It looks like `height: 100%` *is* correctly calculated but only `padding-bottom: 100%` is not.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 4
2021-02-08 05:44:12 PST
<
rdar://problem/74093422
>
Smoley
Comment 5
2021-02-15 18:03:10 PST
Thanks for filing, I'm seeing this issue reproduce on Safari 13.1.3 as well as TOT.
Rob Buis
Comment 6
2021-05-06 09:38:50 PDT
Created
attachment 427894
[details]
Patch
Rob Buis
Comment 7
2021-05-06 11:42:12 PDT
Created
attachment 427915
[details]
Patch
EWS Watchlist
Comment 8
2021-05-06 11:42:56 PDT
This patch modifies the imported WPT tests. Please ensure that any changes on the tests (not coming from a WPT import) are exported to WPT. Please see
https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WPTExportProcess
Rob Buis
Comment 9
2021-05-06 12:54:22 PDT
Created
attachment 427923
[details]
Patch
Rob Buis
Comment 10
2021-05-06 23:20:13 PDT
Created
attachment 427975
[details]
Patch
Rob Buis
Comment 11
2021-05-07 00:49:20 PDT
Created
attachment 427976
[details]
Patch
Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Comment 12
2021-05-27 05:24:14 PDT
Comment on
attachment 427976
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=427976&action=review
r=me
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 > +
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#containing-block-details
(4.2).
Nit: Maybe you can link the new CSS specs here, as this is quite an old reference:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position-3/#absolute-positioning-containing-block
Rob Buis
Comment 13
2021-05-28 03:39:48 PDT
Created
attachment 430000
[details]
Patch
EWS
Comment 14
2021-05-28 04:36:04 PDT
Committed
r278194
(
238237@main
): <
https://commits.webkit.org/238237@main
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 430000
[details]
.
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 15
2022-12-14 12:54:30 PST
***
Bug 133049
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug