WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
220659
[GPUProcess] Improve the GPUProcess' memory pressure handler
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220659
Summary
[GPUProcess] Improve the GPUProcess' memory pressure handler
Chris Dumez
Reported
2021-01-15 08:52:56 PST
Improve the GPUProcess' memory pressure handler to clear things like the IOSurfacePool and the SubimageCacheWithTimer.
Attachments
Patch
(6.93 KB, patch)
2021-01-15 08:54 PST
,
Chris Dumez
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(6.69 KB, patch)
2021-01-15 09:47 PST
,
Chris Dumez
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Chris Dumez
Comment 1
2021-01-15 08:54:35 PST
Created
attachment 417703
[details]
Patch
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 2
2021-01-15 09:37:44 PST
Comment on
attachment 417703
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=417703&action=review
Should we also propagate the memory warning to the web content processes? Or will they also get the warning?
> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:169 > + // Return unused pages back to the OS now as this will likely give us a little memory to work with.
I don't think this comment adds anything. In fact, I'm confused by it.
> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:176 > + if (synchronous == Synchronous::Yes) > + WTF::releaseFastMallocFreeMemory();
What's the reason for calling it a second time?
Chris Dumez
Comment 3
2021-01-15 09:41:25 PST
Comment on
attachment 417703
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=417703&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:169 >> + // Return unused pages back to the OS now as this will likely give us a little memory to work with. > > I don't think this comment adds anything. In fact, I'm confused by it.
Ok. This was from releaseMemory() above.
>> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:176 >> + WTF::releaseFastMallocFreeMemory(); > > What's the reason for calling it a second time?
I am not sure. This is a stripped down version of releaseMemory() above.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 4
2021-01-15 09:46:17 PST
Comment on
attachment 417703
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=417703&action=review
>>> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:169 >>> + // Return unused pages back to the OS now as this will likely give us a little memory to work with. >> >> I don't think this comment adds anything. In fact, I'm confused by it. > > Ok. This was from releaseMemory() above.
I need to read more closely. This is releasing "free" memory, so presumably pages that are free to return to the OS. The comments makes more sense now (but the comment should use "free", not "unused" to match the function name).
>>> Source/WebCore/page/MemoryRelease.cpp:176 >>> + WTF::releaseFastMallocFreeMemory(); >> >> What's the reason for calling it a second time? > > I am not sure. This is a stripped down version of releaseMemory() above.
I'm guessing this can touch pages and thus trigger them getting mapped back in.
Chris Dumez
Comment 5
2021-01-15 09:47:09 PST
Created
attachment 417711
[details]
Patch
EWS
Comment 6
2021-01-15 10:29:13 PST
Committed
r271526
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/271526
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 417711
[details]
.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 7
2021-01-15 10:30:22 PST
<
rdar://problem/73254115
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug