WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
22030
Make EventNames usable from multiple threads
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22030
Summary
Make EventNames usable from multiple threads
Alexey Proskuryakov
Reported
2008-11-01 08:03:44 PDT
Event names are used in classes that will be used in worker threads. It is probably impractical to attempt making atomic strings fully thread safe (usable from multiple threads at once), so each thread needs to have its own stringTable, and its own instance of global strings. Patch forthcoming.
Attachments
proposed patch
(238.00 KB, patch)
2008-11-01 15:36 PDT
,
Alexey Proskuryakov
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed patch
(235.80 KB, patch)
2008-11-01 15:38 PDT
,
Alexey Proskuryakov
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1
2008-11-01 15:36:04 PDT
Created
attachment 24836
[details]
proposed patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2
2008-11-01 15:38:37 PDT
Created
attachment 24837
[details]
proposed patch Oops, sent before saving...
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2008-11-03 09:12:58 PST
Comment on
attachment 24837
[details]
proposed patch Any uses in WebKit outside of the "mac" and "win" directories? Typo "Atimic" in one place. What performance impact does this change have? Why is the EventNames constructor public? Why is "int dummy" a member of EventNames? Just to allow the initialization macro to work? I think both the constructor and the dummy member should be private.
> : dummy (0)
There should be a space after the word "dummy" here?
> // Initialization is not thread safe, so this function must be called from the main thread first.
Why not assert this? r=me
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4
2008-11-03 09:51:34 PST
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 24837
[details]
[edit]) > Any uses in WebKit outside of the "mac" and "win" directories?
No, grepping didn't find anything else.
> What performance impact does this change have?
No change on PLT for me. Should I test anything else? I worried about a PLT regression, because this changed AtomicString construction and destruction, but event dispatching is probably not that hot - or is it?
> Why is "int dummy" a member of EventNames? Just to allow the initialization macro > to work?
Yes, that's the reason.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 5
2008-11-04 02:48:08 PST
Committed revision 38094.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug