WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
210832
[JSC] SpeculativeJIT::nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq should expect AnyBigIntUse
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210832
Summary
[JSC] SpeculativeJIT::nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq should expect AnyBigI...
Yusuke Suzuki
Reported
2020-04-21 17:35:13 PDT
[JSC] SpeculativeJIT::nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq should expect AnyBigIntUse
Attachments
Patch
(13.43 KB, patch)
2020-04-21 17:42 PDT
,
Yusuke Suzuki
mark.lam
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 1
2020-04-21 17:42:26 PDT
Created
attachment 397151
[details]
Patch
Mark Lam
Comment 2
2020-04-21 19:13:51 PDT
Comment on
attachment 397151
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=397151&action=review
r=me
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGSpeculativeJIT64.cpp:422 > void SpeculativeJIT::nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq(Node* node, bool invert)
Since we may now need to speculate for AnyBigIntUse, the name nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq (and its caller nonSpeculativeStrictEq) is now inaccurate. I suggest changing them to genericNonPeepholeStrictEq and genericStrictEq respectively. "Generic" here being the generic JSValue case. Or perhaps genericJSValueNonPeepholeStrictEq and genericJSValueStrictEq?
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 3
2020-04-21 19:17:27 PDT
Comment on
attachment 397151
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=397151&action=review
>> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGSpeculativeJIT64.cpp:422 >> void SpeculativeJIT::nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq(Node* node, bool invert) > > Since we may now need to speculate for AnyBigIntUse, the name nonSpeculativeNonPeepholeStrictEq (and its caller nonSpeculativeStrictEq) is now inaccurate. I suggest changing them to genericNonPeepholeStrictEq and genericStrictEq respectively. "Generic" here being the generic JSValue case. Or perhaps genericJSValueNonPeepholeStrictEq and genericJSValueStrictEq?
Nice catch! We should use genericJSValueNonPeepholeStrictEq / genericJSValueStrictEq. Fixed.
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 4
2020-04-21 19:48:31 PDT
Run JSC tests locally.
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 5
2020-04-21 19:54:34 PDT
Committed
r260490
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/260490
>
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 6
2020-04-21 19:55:15 PDT
<
rdar://problem/62149170
>
Yusuke Suzuki
Comment 7
2020-04-21 21:20:00 PDT
Committed
r260501
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/260501
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug