WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
209611
TypedArrays should more gracefully handle OOM during slowDownAndWasteMemory
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209611
Summary
TypedArrays should more gracefully handle OOM during slowDownAndWasteMemory
Keith Miller
Reported
2020-03-26 11:39:44 PDT
TypedArrays should more gracefully handle OOM during slowDownAndWasteMemory
Attachments
Patch
(12.59 KB, patch)
2020-03-26 11:45 PDT
,
Keith Miller
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch for landing
(12.59 KB, patch)
2020-03-26 12:51 PDT
,
Keith Miller
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Keith Miller
Comment 1
2020-03-26 11:45:36 PDT
Created
attachment 394635
[details]
Patch
Keith Miller
Comment 2
2020-03-26 11:46:57 PDT
rdar://problem/60139974
Tadeu Zagallo
Comment 3
2020-03-26 11:52:25 PDT
Comment on
attachment 394635
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=394635&action=review
r=me
> Source/JavaScriptCore/API/JSTypedArray.cpp:255 > + return nullptr;
remove this?
> JSTests/stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js:1 > +let z = new Float64Array(1000);
How slow is this test?
Keith Miller
Comment 4
2020-03-26 12:45:49 PDT
Comment on
attachment 394635
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=394635&action=review
>> Source/JavaScriptCore/API/JSTypedArray.cpp:255 >> + return nullptr; > > remove this?
Removed.
>> JSTests/stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js:1 >> +let z = new Float64Array(1000); > > How slow is this test?
1-2s in Debug.
Keith Miller
Comment 5
2020-03-26 12:51:46 PDT
Created
attachment 394644
[details]
Patch for landing
EWS
Comment 6
2020-03-26 13:27:08 PDT
Committed
r259069
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/259069
> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on
attachment 394644
[details]
.
Aakash Jain
Comment 7
2020-03-27 04:55:08 PDT
(In reply to EWS from
comment #6
)
> Committed
r259069
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/259069
>
The newly added test stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js seems to be consistently failing on jsc-armv7 and jsc-mips. History:
https://results.webkit.org/?suite=javascriptcore-tests&suite=javascriptcore-tests&suite=javascriptcore-tests&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.eager-jettison-no-cjit&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.no-llint&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.no-cjit-validate-phases
EWS:
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/26/builds/12663
,
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/25/builds/12587
Log: stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: Aborted stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: ERROR: Unexpected exit code: 134 FAIL: stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Comment 8
2020-03-27 05:40:49 PDT
(In reply to Aakash Jain from
comment #7
)
> (In reply to EWS from
comment #6
) > > Committed
r259069
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/259069
> > The newly added test stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js seems to > be consistently failing on jsc-armv7 and jsc-mips. > > History: >
https://results.webkit.org/?suite=javascriptcore-tests&suite=javascriptcore
- > tests&suite=javascriptcore-tests&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer- > accessor.js.eager-jettison-no-cjit&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer- > accessor.js.no-llint&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.no- > cjit-validate-phases > > EWS:
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/26/builds/12663
, >
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/25/builds/12587
> > Log: > stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: Aborted > stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: ERROR: Unexpected > exit code: 134 > FAIL: stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager
If this tests require to allocate more than 512MB of RAM then they need to have this at the top: //@ skip if $memoryLimited And then the ARMv7 and MIPS JSC testers should skip this tests. We run the testers on boards with only 2GB of RAM, also Linux doesn't handle OOM situations as good as Mac/iOS, so this testers run with $memoryLimited config option enabled.
Paulo Matos
Comment 9
2020-03-27 10:23:51 PDT
(In reply to Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez from
comment #8
)
> (In reply to Aakash Jain from
comment #7
) > > (In reply to EWS from
comment #6
) > > > Committed
r259069
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/259069
> > > The newly added test stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js seems to > > be consistently failing on jsc-armv7 and jsc-mips. > > > > History: > >
https://results.webkit.org/?suite=javascriptcore-tests&suite=javascriptcore
- > > tests&suite=javascriptcore-tests&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer- > > accessor.js.eager-jettison-no-cjit&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer- > > accessor.js.no-llint&test=stress%2Ftyped-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.no- > > cjit-validate-phases > > > > EWS:
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/26/builds/12663
, > >
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/25/builds/12587
> > > > Log: > > stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: Aborted > > stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager: ERROR: Unexpected > > exit code: 134 > > FAIL: stress/typed-array-oom-in-buffer-accessor.js.dfg-eager > > If this tests require to allocate more than 512MB of RAM then they need to > have this at the top: > //@ skip if $memoryLimited > > And then the ARMv7 and MIPS JSC testers should skip this tests. We run the > testers on boards with only 2GB of RAM, also Linux doesn't handle OOM > situations as good as Mac/iOS, so this testers run with $memoryLimited > config option enabled.
Added
bug 209661
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug