WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
208764
Remove bad assertion in FTLLowerDFGToB3's compileDelBy().
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208764
Summary
Remove bad assertion in FTLLowerDFGToB3's compileDelBy().
Mark Lam
Reported
2020-03-07 09:56:32 PST
The assertion ASSERT(base.gpr() != params[2].gpr()) is wrong because it is legal JS to pass in the same value as the base and subscript. <
rdar://problem/59940095
>
Attachments
proposed patch.
(3.16 KB, patch)
2020-03-07 10:02 PST
,
Mark Lam
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed patch.
(3.15 KB, patch)
2020-03-07 10:08 PST
,
Mark Lam
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Mark Lam
Comment 1
2020-03-07 10:02:44 PST
Created
attachment 392864
[details]
proposed patch.
Mark Lam
Comment 2
2020-03-07 10:05:38 PST
Comment on
attachment 392864
[details]
proposed patch. View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=392864&action=review
> JSTests/stress/delete-by-val-with-base-and-subscript-using-same-cell.js:6 > +for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
I'll reduce this count to 20000 before landing. That should be sufficient.
> JSTests/stress/delete-by-val-with-base-and-subscript-using-same-non-cell.js:6 > +for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
Ditto.
Mark Lam
Comment 3
2020-03-07 10:08:13 PST
Created
attachment 392865
[details]
proposed patch.
Keith Miller
Comment 4
2020-03-07 12:33:17 PST
Comment on
attachment 392865
[details]
proposed patch. r=me
Mark Lam
Comment 5
2020-03-07 13:12:51 PST
Comment on
attachment 392865
[details]
proposed patch. Thanks for the review.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6
2020-03-07 13:56:49 PST
Comment on
attachment 392865
[details]
proposed patch. Clearing flags on attachment: 392865 Committed
r258078
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/258078
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7
2020-03-07 13:56:51 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Saam Barati
Comment 8
2020-03-08 10:10:25 PDT
Comment on
attachment 392865
[details]
proposed patch. View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=392865&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:10 > + JS to pass in the same value as the base and subscript. The runtime will handle
But does the inline cache handle it properly?
Mark Lam
Comment 9
2020-03-08 13:38:33 PDT
(In reply to Saam Barati from
comment #8
)
> Comment on
attachment 392865
[details]
> proposed patch. > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=392865&action=review
> > > Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:10 > > + JS to pass in the same value as the base and subscript. The runtime will handle > > But does the inline cache handle it properly?
Yes. When I said “runtime”, I meant the inline cache as well.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug