RESOLVED WONTFIX207375
[WebCrypto] Add tests for AES-CTR counter overflow 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207375
Summary [WebCrypto] Add tests for AES-CTR counter overflow
Yoshiaki Jitsukawa
Reported 2020-02-06 21:35:13 PST
Add tests for AES-CTR counter overflow in advance so that we can test new AES-CTR implementation. Related bugs: Bug 207238 Bug 207176
Attachments
Patch (10.29 KB, patch)
2020-02-06 21:41 PST, Yoshiaki Jitsukawa 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Yoshiaki Jitsukawa
Comment 1 2020-02-06 21:41:47 PST
Created attachment 390055 [details] Patch
Jiewen Tan
Comment 2 2020-02-07 12:06:25 PST
(In reply to Yoshiaki Jitsukawa from comment #0) > Add tests for AES-CTR counter overflow in advance so that we can test new > AES-CTR implementation. > > Related bugs: > Bug 207238 > Bug 207176 You can use 'See Also' over the top right side to relate bugs. Also, 'Depends on' or 'Blocks' if bugs have dependency.
Jiewen Tan
Comment 3 2020-02-07 12:28:47 PST
Comment on attachment 390055 [details] Patch The test looks solid. However, it seems the same as the one you wrote in Bug 207238.
Yoshiaki Jitsukawa
Comment 4 2020-02-09 17:42:08 PST
(In reply to Jiewen Tan from comment #2) > (In reply to Yoshiaki Jitsukawa from comment #0) > > Add tests for AES-CTR counter overflow in advance so that we can test new > > AES-CTR implementation. > > > > Related bugs: > > Bug 207238 > > Bug 207176 > > You can use 'See Also' over the top right side to relate bugs. Also, > 'Depends on' or 'Blocks' if bugs have dependency. Oh, I wasn't aware of 'See Also'. Thank you.
Yoshiaki Jitsukawa
Comment 5 2020-02-09 18:03:01 PST
(In reply to Jiewen Tan from comment #3) > Comment on attachment 390055 [details] > Patch > > The test looks solid. However, it seems the same as the one you wrote in Bug > 207238. If this patch is OK to land, let me update the patch in Bug 207238 to remove duplicated test part afterward. Otherwise let me close this ticket and continue on Bug 207238. Either is fine to me.
Jiewen Tan
Comment 6 2020-02-10 11:13:20 PST
(In reply to Yoshiaki Jitsukawa from comment #5) > (In reply to Jiewen Tan from comment #3) > > Comment on attachment 390055 [details] > > Patch > > > > The test looks solid. However, it seems the same as the one you wrote in Bug > > 207238. > > If this patch is OK to land, let me update the patch in Bug 207238 to remove > duplicated test part afterward. Otherwise let me close this ticket and > continue on Bug 207238. Either is fine to me. I think it is better for you to add these tests to Bug 207238.
Yoshiaki Jitsukawa
Comment 7 2020-02-11 14:09:08 PST
(In reply to Jiewen Tan from comment #6) > I think it is better for you to add these tests to Bug 207238. OK, I'll do so. Thank you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.