WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
207044
[Web Animations] [WK1] REGRESSION: opacity doesn't animate
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207044
Summary
[Web Animations] [WK1] REGRESSION: opacity doesn't animate
Antoine Quint
Reported
2020-01-31 07:19:08 PST
We fail to animate opacity in WK1 because we make the assumption that just because an animation targets only accelerated properties it will be accelerated and won't need to be updated as it runs in WebAnimation::timeToNextTick(). This is incorrect, an animation may fail to start or may fail to get a composited layer, the latter being the case on WK1 because usesCompositing() is false in RenderLayerCompositor::requiresCompositingForAnimation().
Attachments
Patch
(4.37 KB, patch)
2020-01-31 08:38 PST
,
Antoine Quint
simon.fraser
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1
2020-01-31 07:19:19 PST
<
rdar://problem/59061225
>
Antoine Quint
Comment 2
2020-01-31 08:38:15 PST
Created
attachment 389353
[details]
Patch
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3
2020-01-31 09:20:02 PST
Comment on
attachment 389353
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=389353&action=review
> Source/WebCore/animation/WebAnimation.cpp:1448 > + if (!isCompletelyAccelerated() || !isRunningAccelerated())
This would be clearers as hasAnyNonAcceleratedProperties or something, I think.
> LayoutTests/webanimations/opacity-animation.html:15 > + setTimeout(() => testRunner.notifyDone(), 100);
100ms is a really long test. Would setting the current time and pausing test the same way? Why didn't requestAnimationFrame work?
Antoine Quint
Comment 4
2020-01-31 09:54:23 PST
(In reply to Simon Fraser (smfr) from
comment #3
)
> Comment on
attachment 389353
[details]
> Patch > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=389353&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/animation/WebAnimation.cpp:1448 > > + if (!isCompletelyAccelerated() || !isRunningAccelerated()) > > This would be clearers as hasAnyNonAcceleratedProperties or something, I > think.
I'll switch the code around to have a condition that starts with `if (isCompletelyAccelerated() && isRunningAccelerated())` instead. This covers the case of animations that don't need to be updated while running.
> > LayoutTests/webanimations/opacity-animation.html:15 > > + setTimeout(() => testRunner.notifyDone(), 100); > > 100ms is a really long test. Would setting the current time and pausing test > the same way?
Alas, no, because at that point it would no longer be running an accelerated animation, which is precisely what we're trying to test.
> Why didn't requestAnimationFrame work?
Alas, I'm not sure. I'll try to improve this in
bug 207054
.
Antoine Quint
Comment 5
2020-01-31 09:58:29 PST
Committed
r255504
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/255504
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug