RESOLVED FIXED 203633
[iOS][WK2] Simplify process assertion handling for the network process and service worker processes
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203633
Summary [iOS][WK2] Simplify process assertion handling for the network process and se...
Chris Dumez
Reported 2019-10-30 15:21:31 PDT
Simplify process assertion handling for the network process and service worker processes.
Attachments
Patch (25.20 KB, patch)
2019-10-30 15:35 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (25.00 KB, patch)
2019-10-30 15:47 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (37.82 KB, patch)
2019-11-04 11:30 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (37.81 KB, patch)
2019-11-04 12:29 PST, Chris Dumez
no flags
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2019-10-30 15:35:08 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 2 2019-10-30 15:47:54 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 3 2019-10-31 13:31:07 PDT
Comment on attachment 382375 [details] Patch ping review?
Chris Dumez
Comment 4 2019-11-04 08:22:02 PST
ping review?
Alex Christensen
Comment 5 2019-11-04 08:34:29 PST
Comment on attachment 382375 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=382375&action=review > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/ProcessThrottler.h:95 > + using ActivityVariant = Variant<std::nullptr_t, std::unique_ptr<BackgroundActivity>, std::unique_ptr<ForegroundActivity>>; Could you use UniqueRef here? You use the non-std::nullptr_t types as if they are always non-null, and right now the nullptr constructor is quite ambiguous. I guess you only use the default constructor, but still...
Chris Dumez
Comment 6 2019-11-04 08:42:29 PST
(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #5) > Comment on attachment 382375 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=382375&action=review > > > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/ProcessThrottler.h:95 > > + using ActivityVariant = Variant<std::nullptr_t, std::unique_ptr<BackgroundActivity>, std::unique_ptr<ForegroundActivity>>; > > Could you use UniqueRef here? You use the non-std::nullptr_t types as if > they are always non-null, and right now the nullptr constructor is quite > ambiguous. I guess you only use the default constructor, but still... I am on the fence about this. I think this would mean having backgroundActivity() / foregroundActivity() return a UniqueRef instead of a unique_ptr, and then a lot of call sites would need to call moveToUniquePtr() to store it as a data member.
Chris Dumez
Comment 7 2019-11-04 11:30:55 PST
Chris Dumez
Comment 8 2019-11-04 12:29:28 PST
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 9 2019-11-04 13:36:33 PST
Comment on attachment 382760 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 382760 Committed r252011: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/252011>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 10 2019-11-04 13:36:35 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 11 2019-11-04 13:37:20 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.