Simplify ProcessThrottler implementation

[Chris Dumez]

Simplify ProcessThrottler implementation.

[Chris Dumez]

Created attachment 381833 [details]
Patch

[Alex Christensen]

Comment on attachment 381833 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=381833&action=review

> Source/WebKit/ChangeLog:13
> +        - Wether the suspension is imminent or not, the child process now always responds with

Whether

> Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/NetworkProcess.cpp:2087
> +void NetworkProcess::prepareToSuspend(uint64_t requestToSuspendID, bool isSuspensionImminent)

Could this be made a typed identifier?  Since it's only used for a reply, could you use sendWithAsyncReply instead?

[Chris Dumez]

(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 381833 [details]
> Patch
> 
> View in context:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=381833&action=review
> 
> > Source/WebKit/ChangeLog:13
> > +        - Wether the suspension is imminent or not, the child process now always responds with
> 
> Whether
> 
> > Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/NetworkProcess.cpp:2087
> > +void NetworkProcess::prepareToSuspend(uint64_t requestToSuspendID, bool isSuspensionImminent)
> 
> Could this be made a typed identifier?  Since it's only used for a reply,
> could you use sendWithAsyncReply instead?

Since the ProcessThrottler needs to know if the response is for the *last* request to suspend, I think the ProcessThrottler will still need an identifier, even if I use sendWithAsyncReply() for the IPC.
Using sendWithAsyncReply() for the IPC is likely feasible, I will try it out to see how it look.

[Chris Dumez]

Created attachment 381850 [details]
Patch

[Chris Dumez]

<rdar://problem/56547883>

[Chris Dumez]

(In reply to Chris Dumez from comment #3)
> (In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #2)
> > Comment on attachment 381833 [details]
> > Patch
> > 
> > View in context:
> > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=381833&action=review
> > 
> > > Source/WebKit/ChangeLog:13
> > > +        - Wether the suspension is imminent or not, the child process now always responds with
> > 
> > Whether
> > 
> > > Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/NetworkProcess.cpp:2087
> > > +void NetworkProcess::prepareToSuspend(uint64_t requestToSuspendID, bool isSuspensionImminent)
> > 
> > Could this be made a typed identifier?  Since it's only used for a reply,
> > could you use sendWithAsyncReply instead?
> 
> Since the ProcessThrottler needs to know if the response is for the *last*
> request to suspend, I think the ProcessThrottler will still need an
> identifier, even if I use sendWithAsyncReply() for the IPC.
> Using sendWithAsyncReply() for the IPC is likely feasible, I will try it out
> to see how it look.

If you don't mind, I'd like to do this refactoring in a follow-up.

[Alex Christensen]

Comment on attachment 381850 [details]
Patch

Sure

[Chris Dumez]

Comment on attachment 381850 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 381850

Committed r251577: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/251577>

[Chris Dumez]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.