Bug 200254 - Disable Flaky API Test TestWebKitAPI.WKWebView.LocalStorageProcessSuspends
Summary: Disable Flaky API Test TestWebKitAPI.WKWebView.LocalStorageProcessSuspends
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: Other
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Aakash Jain
URL:
Keywords: InRadar
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-07-29 16:05 PDT by Aakash Jain
Modified: 2019-07-30 11:05 PDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Patch (1.30 KB, patch)
2019-07-29 16:07 PDT, Aakash Jain
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Aakash Jain 2019-07-29 16:05:04 PDT
API Test TestWebKitAPI.WKWebView.LocalStorageProcessSuspends is extremely flaky. This test is creating issue in EWS infrastructure. It is very flaky and various times flakes in a manner that misleads EWS into blaming the patch being tested (this test failed consistently twice with the patch, and pass without the patch).

e.g.:
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/9/builds/5177
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/9/builds/5145
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/9/builds/5140
https://ews-build.webkit.org/#/builders/9/builds/5109

We should disable the test while the root-cause is being investigated in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200086
Comment 1 Aakash Jain 2019-07-29 16:07:57 PDT
Created attachment 375116 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 WebKit Commit Bot 2019-07-29 16:23:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 375116 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 375116

Committed r247929: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/247929>
Comment 3 WebKit Commit Bot 2019-07-29 16:23:37 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.
Comment 4 Radar WebKit Bug Importer 2019-07-29 16:24:29 PDT
<rdar://problem/53685129>
Comment 5 Alexey Proskuryakov 2019-07-30 11:05:21 PDT
Bot watching changes like this generally don't require a separate bug, just like they don't require a review. But 200086 seems like it would have been sufficient.