Bug 19604 - Re-enable 7 working layout tests
: Re-enable 7 working layout tests
Status: NEW
: WebKit
Layout and Rendering
: 528+ (Nightly build)
: Macintosh Mac OS X 10.5
: P3 Normal
Assigned To:
:
:
:
: 19569
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-17 08:30 PST by
Modified: 2010-06-10 16:06 PST (History)


Attachments
re-enable 7 layout tests (51.40 KB, patch)
2008-06-17 08:32 PST, Jean-Charles Verdié
darin: review-
Review Patch | Details | Formatted Diff | Diff


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description From 2008-06-17 08:30:16 PST
this patch re-enabled 7 working layout tests
------- Comment #1 From 2008-06-17 08:32:36 PST -------
Created an attachment (id=21755) [details]
re-enable 7 layout tests
------- Comment #2 From 2008-06-25 03:28:32 PST -------
+        * http/tests/xmlhttprequest/web-apps/006-expected.txt: Added.

Why is this file added without any changes to the test itself (not that I think that this test should be enabled)
------- Comment #3 From 2008-10-12 16:47:18 PST -------
(From update of attachment 21755 [details])
I don't think you did enough research on why these tests were disabled.

For example, the two counters tests were disabled in <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/18642> with this comment: "disabled 3 tests with results that are too font-dependent to be used as part of the test suite". So we can't just re-enable those tests unless we resolve the issue about getting appropriate fonts on everyone's computer.

And fast/frames/iframe-scroll-page-up-down.html fails when I run it on my machine, so I don't agree that it's working.

The crash that fast/images/svg-background-crash-on-refresh.html was causing was something that affected tests downstream. I'm not confident that bringing this patch back won't bring back the reason we turned it off in the first place; I'll need more evidence before doing that.

The create-list-1.html test does not give the expected result that's checked in, so if we wanted to bring it back we'd have to fix the expected result.

Overall, this patch isn't usable as-is. Changing to review-.