[WPE] Inline wl_array_for_each to workaround C++ compatibility issue

[Charlie Turner]

[WPE] Condition use of wl_array_for_each on GCC

[Charlie Turner]

Created attachment 362603 [details]
Patch

[Adrian Perez]

There's an upstream bug report related to this:

   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/issues/34

As discussed with Charlie in a chat, it seems a tad better
to have the “for”-loop expanded by hand in this code instead
of relying on the wl_arrat_for_each() macro, instead of disabling
the block of code completely.

[Charlie Turner]

Created attachment 362715 [details]
Patch

[Adrian Perez]

Comment on attachment 362715 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=362715&action=review

Informal r+ from me, with a (very) minor nit.

> Tools/wpe/backends/WindowViewBackend.cpp:451
> +        while (pos < end) {

Minor nitpick: I would probably write this as a for-loop with empty initializer list:

    for (; pos < end; pos++)

Though this is mainly personal preference, because I find code easier to follow when
the “increment” done on each iteration is written along the header of the loop :)

> Tools/wpe/backends/WindowViewBackend.cpp:452
> +            uint32_t state = *pos;

Alternatively, if you prefer to keep the “while”, you can do:

    uint32_t state = *pos++;

[Charlie Turner]

Created attachment 362722 [details]
Patch

Thanks Adrian, I will go with your style and use the for-loop

[WebKit Commit Bot]

Comment on attachment 362722 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 362722

Committed r242344: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/242344>

[WebKit Commit Bot]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.

[Olivier Blin]

*** Bug 194290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***