RESOLVED FIXED 193704
Introduce CustomUndoStep.h and CustomUndoStep.cpp
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193704
Summary Introduce CustomUndoStep.h and CustomUndoStep.cpp
Wenson Hsieh
Reported 2019-01-22 19:43:40 PST
Attachments
Patch (13.55 KB, patch)
2019-01-22 19:46 PST, Wenson Hsieh
rniwa: review+
Patch for landing (13.33 KB, patch)
2019-01-22 21:30 PST, Wenson Hsieh
wenson_hsieh: commit-queue-
Patch for landing (11.85 KB, patch)
2019-01-22 21:32 PST, Wenson Hsieh
no flags
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 1 2019-01-22 19:46:11 PST
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 2 2019-01-22 19:51:39 PST
Comment on attachment 359840 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=359840&action=review > Source/WebCore/editing/CompositeEditCommand.h:91 > + const String& customUndoLabel() const final { return emptyString(); } I think a better approach is have the conversion from EditAction to label here.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 3 2019-01-22 19:52:33 PST
(In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 359840 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=359840&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/editing/CompositeEditCommand.h:91 > > + const String& customUndoLabel() const final { return emptyString(); } > > I think a better approach is have the conversion from EditAction to label > here. Not saying that we should make such a change in this patch but I think having editAction() & customUndoLabel() is rather confusing so we probably shouldn't add such a method. Also, this label is used for redo as well so saying it's undo label is quite misleading.
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 4 2019-01-22 20:03:13 PST
(In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #3) > (In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #2) > > Comment on attachment 359840 [details] > > Patch > > > > View in context: > > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=359840&action=review > > > > > Source/WebCore/editing/CompositeEditCommand.h:91 > > > + const String& customUndoLabel() const final { return emptyString(); } > > > > I think a better approach is have the conversion from EditAction to label > > here. > > Not saying that we should make such a change in this patch but I think > having editAction() & customUndoLabel() is rather confusing so we probably > shouldn't add such a method. Also, this label is used for redo as well so > saying it's undo label is quite misleading. That's a good point! This will take a bit of refactoring, but I think it's worth it (this should also allow us to remove some duplicate code between WebKitLegacy and WebKit). I'll land this patch (Part 2) without customUndoLabel() for now, and write up a patch to add an undoRedoLabel() method to UndoStep instead. This refactoring patch will sit between this one (Part 2) and the Part 3 I had planned.
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 5 2019-01-22 21:30:22 PST
Created attachment 359848 [details] Patch for landing
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 6 2019-01-22 21:32:31 PST
Created attachment 359849 [details] Patch for landing
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7 2019-01-22 22:10:51 PST
Comment on attachment 359849 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 359849 Committed r240328: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/240328>
Wenson Hsieh
Comment 8 2019-01-22 22:29:29 PST
(In reply to Wenson Hsieh from comment #4) > (In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #3) > > (In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #2) > > > Comment on attachment 359840 [details] > > > Patch > > > > > > View in context: > > > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=359840&action=review > > > > > > > Source/WebCore/editing/CompositeEditCommand.h:91 > > > > + const String& customUndoLabel() const final { return emptyString(); } > > > > > > I think a better approach is have the conversion from EditAction to label > > > here. > > > > Not saying that we should make such a change in this patch but I think > > having editAction() & customUndoLabel() is rather confusing so we probably > > shouldn't add such a method. Also, this label is used for redo as well so > > saying it's undo label is quite misleading. > > That's a good point! This will take a bit of refactoring, but I think it's > worth it (this should also allow us to remove some duplicate code between > WebKitLegacy and WebKit). I'll land this patch (Part 2) without > customUndoLabel() for now, and write up a patch to add an undoRedoLabel() > method to UndoStep instead. > > This refactoring patch will sit between this one (Part 2) and the Part 3 I > had planned. I filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193706 to track this refactoring.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.