RESOLVED FIXED 186501
[Web Animations] Make WPT test at interfaces/KeyframeEffect/processing-a-keyframes-argument-001.html pass reliably
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186501
Summary [Web Animations] Make WPT test at interfaces/KeyframeEffect/processing-a-keyf...
Antoine Quint
Reported 2018-06-11 04:39:34 PDT
The WPT test at imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/web-animations/interfaces/KeyframeEffect/processing-a-keyframes-argument-001.html is failing reliably, flaky or timing out.
Attachments
Patch (20.66 KB, patch)
2018-07-10 16:02 PDT, Antoine Quint
dino: review+
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2018-06-11 04:39:48 PDT
Antoine Quint
Comment 2 2018-07-10 16:02:52 PDT
EWS Watchlist
Comment 3 2018-07-10 16:05:42 PDT
Attachment 344728 [details] did not pass style-queue: ERROR: Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffectReadOnly.cpp:178: Should have only a single space after a punctuation in a comment. [whitespace/comments] [5] Total errors found: 1 in 6 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Dean Jackson
Comment 4 2018-07-10 19:13:30 PDT
Comment on attachment 344728 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=344728&action=review > Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffectReadOnly.cpp:293 > + // When calling processKeyframeLikeObject() with the "allow lists" flag set to false, the only alternatives > + // we should expect are double and nullptr. The only offset alternatives. > Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffectReadOnly.cpp:300 > + // When calling processKeyframeLikeObject() with the "allow lists" flag set to false, the only alternative > + // we should expect is String. The only easing alternative > Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffectReadOnly.cpp:305 > + // When calling processKeyframeLikeObject() with the "allow lists" flag set to false, the only alternatives > + // we should expect are CompositeOperation and nullptr. The only composite alternatives > Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffectReadOnly.cpp:325 > + RETURN_IF_EXCEPTION(scope, Exception { TypeError }); Why do you need this? Wouldn't the exception have been thrown in the inner scope (the forEach)? I don't think anything else could throw in this scope.
Antoine Quint
Comment 5 2018-07-11 08:54:09 PDT
Antoine Quint
Comment 6 2018-07-11 09:34:44 PDT
Antoine Quint
Comment 7 2018-07-11 09:40:33 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.