RESOLVED FIXED Bug 185043
Expose "$262.agent.monotonicNow()" for use in testing Atomic operation timeouts
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185043
Summary Expose "$262.agent.monotonicNow()" for use in testing Atomic operation timeouts
Rick Waldron
Reported 2018-04-26 13:24:07 PDT
During a discussion (re: Atomics testing in Test262) with Filip Pizlo this afternoon, we determined that $262.agent should expose a new function that returns a monotonically increasing time value (to avoid relying on Date.now()). I believe this can be implemented by exposing a wrapper for MonotonicTime::now() (Patch to follow)
Attachments
$262.agent.monotonicNow() (2.32 KB, patch)
2018-04-26 17:44 PDT, Rick Waldron
no flags
$262.agent.monotonicNow() (4.37 KB, patch)
2018-04-27 08:02 PDT, Rick Waldron
no flags
$262.agent.monotonicNow() (3.13 KB, patch)
2018-04-27 08:12 PDT, Rick Waldron
fpizlo: review+
$262.agent.monotonicNow() (2.39 KB, patch)
2018-04-27 08:36 PDT, Rick Waldron
no flags
$262.agent.monotonicNow() (3.00 KB, patch)
2018-04-30 07:43 PDT, Rick Waldron
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from ews200 for win-future (12.87 MB, application/zip)
2018-04-30 09:27 PDT, EWS Watchlist
no flags
Rick Waldron
Comment 1 2018-04-26 17:44:45 PDT
Created attachment 338943 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow()
Filip Pizlo
Comment 2 2018-04-27 06:39:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 338943 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() Looks good. All it needs is a change log and I can r+ it.
Rick Waldron
Comment 3 2018-04-27 08:02:12 PDT
Created attachment 338988 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow()
Rick Waldron
Comment 4 2018-04-27 08:12:26 PDT
Created attachment 338989 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow()
Filip Pizlo
Comment 5 2018-04-27 08:15:33 PDT
Comment on attachment 338989 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() R=me but the changelog looks pretty goofy. Why does it claim that you changed all of those functions?
Rick Waldron
Comment 6 2018-04-27 08:30:32 PDT
I'm not sure, but I wonder if the changelog program sees all of the uncommitted whitespace changes that exist in the file. I'd like to "discard changes" for those whitespace bits and regenerate the changelog entry.
Rick Waldron
Comment 7 2018-04-27 08:36:39 PDT
Created attachment 338991 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() Filip, sure enough—the whitespace changes that existed in jsc.cpp, but not committed, were treated as meaningful changes to report. I'll be more mindful of that in the future.
Rick Waldron
Comment 8 2018-04-30 07:43:25 PDT
Created attachment 339108 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow()
EWS Watchlist
Comment 9 2018-04-30 09:27:28 PDT
Comment on attachment 339108 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() Attachment 339108 [details] did not pass win-ews (win): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/7507664 New failing tests: http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/userAgentShadowDOM/allow-audio.html
EWS Watchlist
Comment 10 2018-04-30 09:27:40 PDT
Created attachment 339112 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews200 for win-future The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the win-ews. Bot: ews200 Port: win-future Platform: CYGWIN_NT-6.1-2.9.0-0.318-5-3-x86_64-64bit
Filip Pizlo
Comment 11 2018-04-30 09:53:49 PDT
(In reply to rwaldron from comment #8) > Created attachment 339108 [details] > $262.agent.monotonicNow() Did you mean to commit this version? Looks like ews is having issues on Windows but it looks like an unrelated flaky failure. If you’d like, I can call+ it again or land manually.
Rick Waldron
Comment 12 2018-04-30 19:06:13 PDT
(In reply to Filip Pizlo from comment #11) > (In reply to rwaldron from comment #8) > > Created attachment 339108 [details] > > $262.agent.monotonicNow() > > Did you mean to commit this version? Yes, this new patch was intentional. Because I had to do interactive per-line staging to avoid committing all of the whitespace changes, I accidentally missed this line: static EncodedJSValue JSC_HOST_CALL functionDollarAgentMonotonicNow(ExecState*); So I had to replace the existing patch with a revised patch. > Looks like ews is having issues on > Windows but it looks like an unrelated flaky failure. I have no idea why that windows test is failing, that's definitely odd. > If you’d like, I can call+ it again or land manually. Whichever is easiest for you?
Filip Pizlo
Comment 13 2018-05-02 09:37:39 PDT
Comment on attachment 339108 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() Let’s try that again.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 14 2018-05-02 10:05:57 PDT
Comment on attachment 339108 [details] $262.agent.monotonicNow() Clearing flags on attachment: 339108 Committed r231238: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/231238>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 15 2018-05-02 10:05:58 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 16 2018-05-02 10:08:13 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.