Should we rename UNUSED to BUNUSED? This would make it less likely to be misused outside of bmalloc, as I did in bug #184081.
Created attachment 336669 [details] Patch
Created attachment 336738 [details] Patch
Pinging bmalloc reviewers!
Comment on attachment 336738 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=336738&action=review r=me > Source/bmalloc/bmalloc/BAssert.h:103 > +#define BUNUSED(x) ((void)x) renaming this to `BUNUSED_PARAM` would be good. But either is OK to me.
Comment on attachment 336738 [details] Patch I kinda prefer BUNUSED, it's short and sweet, but no strong preference here either. Whatever the bmalloc crew prefers.
Comment on attachment 336738 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 336738 Committed r230463: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/230463>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
<rdar://problem/39301964>